Why Do Some People Freeze Their Weights Before Exercising?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter curio7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Temperature
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the practice of freezing weights before exercising, exploring potential reasons and effects related to physics, biology, and psychology. Participants question the rationale behind this behavior and its implications for performance during weight training.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that cooling weights might have a physiological effect, such as preventing body temperature from rising and potentially extending exercise duration.
  • Others argue that the weight of cold objects is not significantly different from warm ones, implying that the practice may not have a physical basis.
  • One participant mentions the condensation that forms on cold weights, questioning its relevance.
  • There are claims that psychological factors could play a role, with some suggesting that belief in the effectiveness of cold weights might enhance performance.
  • A few participants express skepticism about the reliability of sources that support the practice, citing concerns about the validity of claims made in popular media.
  • Discussions touch on the distinction between weight and mass, with some confusion expressed regarding how temperature might affect these properties.
  • One participant humorously suggests that the practice could be linked to training for extreme conditions like ice climbing, though this is not widely supported in the discussion.
  • Concerns are raised about the negligible effects of temperature on mass and buoyancy in the context of weight training.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the reasons for freezing weights or the validity of the practice. Multiple competing views remain, with some supporting the idea of physiological benefits and others dismissing it as unfounded.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the effects of temperature on mass and buoyancy, and there is a lack of empirical evidence to support claims made about the benefits of using cold weights.

curio7
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I know somebody who puts their weights in the freezer before they use them. (photographic proof: http://i41.tinypic.com/24473ow.jpg) I have no clue why they do this, and they refuse to explain the purpose behind the action. Is there any physics related meaning to this action?

Somebody else mentioned that the energy required to warm his hands from the freezing temperature of the weights might mean more calories utilized, but I can't imagine that you would use that many calories to warm your hands.

Any ideas?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Well, cold weights weigh less than warm ones, so he's cheating! :-p
 
The weights will keep getting wet from condensation, whatever that is worth.

I see they have a large and diversified food supply. Chuckle.

DC
 
There is no significant effects that I can think of that would cause someone to do this. Either they heard something somewhere that said it had a benefit, or they just like cold weights.
 
I once saw something like this on discovery. It actually keeps the body temperature from rising and experiments show that it really is effective and increases the time for how long you can keep going.
 
AlchemistK said:
I once saw something like this on discovery. It actually keeps the body temperature from rising and experiments show that it really is effective and increases the time for how long you can keep going.

I couldn't find anything on a quick google search, so I'm going to remain skeptical for now.
 
I would've linked the video, but I can't seem to find it. The experiment was that they took a weightlifter as a test subject, made him lift weights till he was exhausted and then in the second run, made him use the "cool core glove" and he managed to keep going a lot longer than before.

I'm positive I've seen it on discovery, and I think that's a reliable source.
 
  • #10
AlchemistK said:
I would've linked the video, but I can't seem to find it. The experiment was that they took a weightlifter as a test subject, made him lift weights till he was exhausted and then in the second run, made him use the "cool core glove" and he managed to keep going a lot longer than before.

I'm positive I've seen it on discovery, and I think that's a reliable source.

I rarely find TV to be a reliable source on anything to do with physics. However I am not saying that it cannot work, I am saying that I don't know if it could work or not and I don't consider the information I've viewed to be reliable. It looks and smells very similar to boloney. Especially the claim that the results of using it work even if you don't use it that day. Everything about the site from the way they explain how it works to the diagrams they show of the body just looks too much like other boloney sites.
 
  • #11
I have no idea why someone would cool weights...Probably getting confused between weight and mass? I am afraid that my physics is a little rusty after coming back to a subject I loved at school at my father's behest but, surely cooling weights would have more to do mass? the cooler something is the more mass it has? Like I said a little rusty so some gentle encouragement in the right direction would be nice.
 
  • #12
petej said:
I have no idea why someone would cool weights...Probably getting confused between weight and mass? I am afraid that my physics is a little rusty after coming back to a subject I loved at school at my father's behest but, surely cooling weights would have more to do mass? the cooler something is the more mass it has? Like I said a little rusty so some gentle encouragement in the right direction would be nice.

Hotter things have more energy and are thus more massive. However the amount of mass gained by heating something small 50 degrees is so extremely negligible, you would NEVER care about it in this case if you were worried about mass.
 
  • #13
Drakkith said:
Hotter things have more energy and are thus more massive.

On the other hand, hotter things expand, so the buoyancy force from the air is bigger.

Air buoyancy does matter for precision weighing, but probably not for weight training.
 
  • #14
Are they training for ice climbing or mountaineering? Maintaining control of your body while in moderate pain is important for both and there is a long history of carrying snowballs while running and other such physical torture.
There is also a long history of athletes believing completely false information because somebody stronger than they are did it once. I doubt physics has anything to do with this.
(as a side note, muscles do perform better when cool, but your hand muscles are not very important to lifting)
 
  • #15
Well I have happened to notice that people often drop weights when the amount becomes overwhelming I suppose but highly doubt it could be something to do with how much then bounce if he drops them as he may not want them landing on his toe as if they where warmer I think the particles inside the metal would be under higher pressure making it bounce higher. Or I suppose he could just like cold weights as his hands get warm and this stops them from sweating and slipping out of his hands.
 
  • #16
I don't think this has anything to do with physics, its much more of a biology thing. The effects of temperature on mass,buoyancy, etc etc. would be completely negligible. Even a psychological effect would create much more of a difference than physics, just knowing that its going to help will automatically improve performance.
 
  • #17
AlchemistK said:
I don't think this has anything to do with physics, its much more of a biology thing. The effects of temperature on mass,buoyancy, etc etc. would be completely negligible. Even a psychological effect would create much more of a difference than physics, just knowing that its going to help will automatically improve performance.

I would lean more towards this idea as well as he also refuses to say why so it would seem quite probable that he does not want to sound "silly" by saying it makes him work better.
 
  • #18
Kieranlavelle said:
I would lean more towards this idea as well as he also refuses to say why so it would seem quite probable that he does not want to sound "silly" by saying it makes him work better.

Agreed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 152 ·
6
Replies
152
Views
11K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 94 ·
4
Replies
94
Views
14K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K