Why Do Terms in the Energy Equation Not Cancel as Expected?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the equation relating potential and gravitational energy, specifically why certain terms do not cancel as expected. The equation is clarified to show that gravitational energy is represented as mgh, where mg is the force acting on the mass. When manipulating the equation, it is important to multiply and divide by the same factors to maintain equality, which leads to the expression v1² + 2gy1. The cancellation of terms occurs correctly, but the presence of the factor of 2 in front of gy1 is necessary due to the nature of gravitational energy. Ultimately, understanding the distinction between force and energy is crucial for proper equation manipulation.
2much
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I have an equation relating potential energy1 plus gravitational energy1 = potential energy2 plus gravitational energy2

1/2 mv21 + mg1 = 1/2 mv22 + mg2

Now cancelling out the terms I have

v21 + 2gy1 + v22 2gy2

Now I don't understand why mg in the second term of both expressions don't cancel out. Why are we left with 2gy, not just y
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First of all, note that gravitational energy is mgh, mg is just the force.
So you presumably meant

1/2 m v1² + mgy1= 1/2 m v2² + mgy2

Then you can multiply by 2 and divide it by m, but of course then you have to multiply everything, which gives

2/m(1/2 m v1² + mgy1) = 2/m (1/2 m v1²) + 2/m (mgy1) = v1² + 2gy1.
The 2 and 1/2 cancel out in the first term, and the m cancels out in both terms, but you have to leave the rest.
The right hand side is similar.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top