Why do things produce sound even though no pressure is applied to them?

AI Thread Summary
Sound is generated through mechanical waves that propagate pressure in a medium, such as air. When opening a chip packet, the stiff plastic creates brief resistance before triggering a rapid movement, compressing the air and producing sound. This results in high-pitched pressure waves due to the quick compression from multiple small movements of the packet's surface. Each movement creates small pressure peaks, which we perceive as a crackling sound. Understanding this phenomenon illustrates how sound can be produced without direct pressure application.
leoneul
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I understand that sound is a propagating pressure through a medium. We produced pressure and it’ll propagate through the medium as “sound”. How can we use this model to understand everyday-life experiences like opening a chips packaging and the packaging makes a sound, and alike. In the chips example, where does the pressure even come from so that the sound we hear is produced?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is just an educated guess:

The crinkly plastic of a chip packet ('crisp packet' to our UK users) is a bit stiff, so that it does not deform smoothly like a piece of soft cloth does. Accordingly, when we bend it with our hands, as we do when opening it. it resists briefly and then gives way in a triggering sort of movement. A triggered movement is much faster than a smooth one, and hence will compress the air it is moving towards much more than a slow gradual movement will. That brief but fast compression creates a high-pitched pressure wave that we hear.

The crinkling sound we hear when somebody is handling a packet of chips is the combination of many pressure waves from lots of little triggerings, as the packet briefly resists and then triggers in many different places.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters and Drakkith
leoneul said:
I understand that sound is a propagating pressure through a medium. We produced pressure and it’ll propagate through the medium as “sound”.
Not quite ... Sound is a propagating pressure wave in a medium :smile:
It is mechanical wave generated by any mechanical operation, from the slipping of rock on a fault line
causing seismic P waves, to a hammer striking metal, to your vocal cords vibrating to produce sound wavesDave
 
leoneul said:
where does the pressure even come from
If any surface moves against a body of air, then there will be a force against the resistance of the surrounding air (i.e. pressure as the air is slightly compressed), locally. In the long term, the air will flow and equalise the pressure. The step increase in pressure will propagate outwards and gradually disperse. The individual small parts of a crisp packet surface will move in small steps which will produce many small pressure peaks (whereas a piece of cloth will tend to flow silently). We hear those peaks as a crackling sound.
 
leoneul said:
We produced pressure and it’ll propagate through the medium as “sound”.

Feynman - perhaps not to say in which book - in the second paragraph of chapter 47-2 describe the propagation of sound in a manner described above.

How the strange sound is created can be thought of, but in its own way, every voice is weird.
 
Periwinkle said:
Feynman - perhaps not to say in which book - in the second paragraph of chapter 47-2 describe the propagation of sound in a manner described above.

seriously too complex for a B level thread ... Half of it was even over my head
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top