Why Do Transformer Voltage-Current Graphs Disagree?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the discrepancy between the primary voltage-current graph of an open-circuited transformer and the straight line predicted by its equivalent circuit. The user questions whether the difference is due to changes in the core's relative permeability as it approaches saturation, which is known to affect magnetic properties and introduce non-linearities. Responses highlight that permeability is not constant and decreases at saturation, leading to hysteresis losses and potential distortion in signals. The conversation emphasizes the complexity of transformer behavior under varying conditions and the need for deeper understanding of core materials. Overall, the interaction reveals the importance of considering non-linear effects in transformer analysis.
ChrisHarvey
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
I have obtained the approximate equivalent circuit of a transformer at its rated supply voltage having carried out the open circuit and short circuit tests on it.

If I plot a graph of primary voltage against primary current for an open-circuited transformer I get a curve. If I use my equivalent circuit to give me predicted values for this, it gives me a straight line which intersects the curve at 2 places: one intersection is at the rated voltage.

Why is it that the 2 graphs do not agree?

I have thought about it and am wondering if it has anything to do with the fact that the relative permeability of the core changes as it reaches saturation. This would change my graphs in the 'right direction' but I have read nothing about this kind of thing in any textbook - but then I can't find this explained anywhere.

Is this idea correct, or is there some other reason for this?

Thank you very much to anyone who can give me any help,
it is much appreciated,
Chris
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Permeability of magnetic cores is not in general a constant and heads towards zero at saturation -- look up the topic of Hysteresis this deals with losses in cores in AC conditions . Since this is a non-linear effect it is often only represented as an equivalent resistance ( but recognizing this is an average value under the exciting conditions ) , in fact it would give rise to harmonics of a sine signal hence distortion in audio signals as well as pure losses. Some materials are far better than others hence their use in so called high'Q' coils or at RF. Try 'Wikipedia' for an explanation , search Yahoo.
Ray
 
Thankyou for your reply - I've found it really helpful.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top