Why Do Velocity Components Depend on All Spatial Variables in Fluid Mechanics?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion regarding the velocity components of a fluid flow vector field, specifically why the velocity components u, v, and w depend on all spatial variables (x, y, z) and time (t). It clarifies that while u represents the velocity in the x-direction, it can also vary with y due to factors like flow profile, as illustrated by an example of a river where velocity changes across its width. The arrows in the velocity field indeed represent the velocity of fluid particles at specific positions. Additionally, it is confirmed that streamlines and pathlines coincide in steady flow conditions. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping fluid dynamics.
R Power
Messages
270
Reaction score
0
HI
I was a under a little confusion about vector field.
Consider velocity field of fluid flow:

V = u i + v j + w k

here V is vector and consider a cap over i, j, k (since they represent x,y,z directions)

now we know that u,v,w are functions of x,y,z,t. This is where i am confused.

u is velocity component in x direction then it should be function of only x and t. Why y and z also??

In a velocity field we see arrows representing magnitude and direction of velocity at any position, are these arrows over fluid particles? I mean can i assume each arrow as a particle at that position having certain velocity represented by the arrow?

I think i lack understanding of fluid velocity field. Can anyone expalin a bit.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi R Power! :smile:

(use i j and k :wink:)
R Power said:
u is velocity component in x direction then it should be function of only x and t. Why y and z also??

Imagine a river of width 60m flowing steadily in the x-direction.

The water is fastest in the middle, say 3 m/s, and zero near the bank.

So in the middle, the velocity vector is 3i, and at distance y from the middle, it is (|30 - y|/10)i

u is a function of y, but is independent of x. :wink:
In a velocity field we see arrows representing magnitude and direction of velocity at any position, are these arrows over fluid particles? I mean can i assume each arrow as a particle at that position having certain velocity represented by the arrow?

Yes, that's exactly correct, the value of the velocity field at each point is the velocity of the actual particle that is (instantaneously) at that point. :smile:
 
Yes, that's exactly correct, the value of the velocity field at each point is the velocity of the actual particle that is (instantaneously) at that point.
If this is so streamlines should be same as pathlines whether flow is steady or unsteady. Am I correct?
Tiny Tim, please answer my another post relating to streamlines,streaklines,pathlines in mechanical engineering section.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top