Why Do Water Softeners Prefer Calcium Over Sodium Ions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter minime191
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Water Work
AI Thread Summary
Ion-exchange resins in water softeners preferentially attract calcium ions (Ca2+) over sodium ions (Na+) due to the higher charge of calcium, which enhances its attraction to the negatively charged sulfonate sites on the resin. During the regeneration process, sodium ions from saturated NaCl replace the calcium ions, driven by the principles of concentration and collision theory, where higher concentrations lead to increased interactions. The equilibrium process allows for efficient recharging of the resin with sodium ions, necessary for ongoing water softening. Understanding these mechanisms is crucial for optimizing the performance of water softeners. The discussion emphasizes the importance of ion charge and concentration in the ion-exchange process.
minime191
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Explain the following features of ion-exchange resins in a home water softener.
(a) Negatively charged sulfonate “sites” on resin molecules attract Ca2+
(aq) ions better than Na+ (aq) ions. (Consider the ion charges in your answer.)

(b) Sodium ions from saturated NaCl(aq) replace calcium ions during regeneration. (Consider the concentration and collision theory in your answer.)

Homework Equations


More concentration results in higher collision.

The Attempt at a Solution


I think I've got a figured out;
The negative charge attracts the positive charges. But since calcium has 2, it has a higher charge hence is attracts better than Na.
I don't know what to do about b. Can I please get some direction?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This is an equilibrium process.
 
part b talks about how the ion exchange resin could be 'recharged' with sodiums ions required in the process of softening water as mentioned in part a.

Try this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ion_exchange_resin" page for a short and concise description of the process.

The key word to tackling question b is saturated NaCl(aq).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top