Why do we deal with perfect numbers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DyslexicHobo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Numbers
AI Thread Summary
Perfect numbers, while intriguing to mathematicians, have little practical application in the real world and are primarily of interest due to their historical significance and aesthetic appeal. Their connection to ancient Greek numerology and Euclidean mathematics underscores their cultural importance rather than functional use. Discussions also touch on amicable numbers, which share a similar charm, with examples like 220 and 284 illustrating their unique properties. The conversation emphasizes that the fascination with these numbers stems from their mathematical beauty rather than any inherent utility. Ultimately, perfect numbers are appreciated for their mathematical elegance rather than real-world relevance.
DyslexicHobo
Messages
249
Reaction score
0
Do perfect numbers have any relation to the real world, or any type of use at all?

It seems that they aren't so perfect, just because base 10 doesn't really occur in nature--ever.

Is there any sort of importance of these numbers, or is it just some phenomena that happens that mathematicians like to look at? :P

Thanks for responses. :)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Perfect numbers have nothing to do with base 10. Most mathematics is about what mathematicians like to look at.
 
probably because they occur in euclid.
 
I don't suppose they have any real use, but the Greeks gave them importance and were believers in numerology.

The matter can be generalized some to Amicable Numbers, such as 284 and 220, where each has divisors less than itself that sum up to the other.

220 = (2^2)x5x11, and the sum of the divisors less than itself is: (1+2+4)(1+5)(1+11)-220 = 7x6x12-220 = 284. While 284 =4x71, and the divisors (1+2+4)(71+1)-284=220.
These numbers were given importance even in things like marrage.

Fermat and Descartes both discovered new sets of amicable numbers.
 
Last edited:
Ok, I see. So they're just numbers that are very "nice" numbers.


AKG said:
Perfect numbers have nothing to do with base 10. Most mathematics is about what mathematicians like to look at.

The only time I've seen perfect numbers are in base 10. I wasn't thinking, though... because it doesn't matter what the base is, they're going to be perfect no matter what. D'oh. >_<

Thanks for the replies.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top