Why do we deal with perfect numbers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DyslexicHobo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Numbers
AI Thread Summary
Perfect numbers, while intriguing to mathematicians, have little practical application in the real world and are primarily of interest due to their historical significance and aesthetic appeal. Their connection to ancient Greek numerology and Euclidean mathematics underscores their cultural importance rather than functional use. Discussions also touch on amicable numbers, which share a similar charm, with examples like 220 and 284 illustrating their unique properties. The conversation emphasizes that the fascination with these numbers stems from their mathematical beauty rather than any inherent utility. Ultimately, perfect numbers are appreciated for their mathematical elegance rather than real-world relevance.
DyslexicHobo
Messages
249
Reaction score
0
Do perfect numbers have any relation to the real world, or any type of use at all?

It seems that they aren't so perfect, just because base 10 doesn't really occur in nature--ever.

Is there any sort of importance of these numbers, or is it just some phenomena that happens that mathematicians like to look at? :P

Thanks for responses. :)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Perfect numbers have nothing to do with base 10. Most mathematics is about what mathematicians like to look at.
 
probably because they occur in euclid.
 
I don't suppose they have any real use, but the Greeks gave them importance and were believers in numerology.

The matter can be generalized some to Amicable Numbers, such as 284 and 220, where each has divisors less than itself that sum up to the other.

220 = (2^2)x5x11, and the sum of the divisors less than itself is: (1+2+4)(1+5)(1+11)-220 = 7x6x12-220 = 284. While 284 =4x71, and the divisors (1+2+4)(71+1)-284=220.
These numbers were given importance even in things like marrage.

Fermat and Descartes both discovered new sets of amicable numbers.
 
Last edited:
Ok, I see. So they're just numbers that are very "nice" numbers.


AKG said:
Perfect numbers have nothing to do with base 10. Most mathematics is about what mathematicians like to look at.

The only time I've seen perfect numbers are in base 10. I wasn't thinking, though... because it doesn't matter what the base is, they're going to be perfect no matter what. D'oh. >_<

Thanks for the replies.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...

Similar threads

Back
Top