Why do we feel tired when holding something without any movement?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Vicol
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Holding an object without movement leads to fatigue due to the energy required to maintain muscle tension. Even though mechanical work is zero since there is no displacement, biological systems like muscles need chemical energy to sustain this tension. Muscle fibers continuously contract and relax, consuming energy in the process. This phenomenon explains why one feels tired despite not moving the held object. Ultimately, maintaining a fixed position requires energy, similar to pushing against a wall.
Vicol
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone :)

Could someone explain me how is it possible that we "lose energy" when we hold something in our hands though there is no shift/displacement? We feel it physically - tiredness.

I can generalize this question - to keep something at certain height we have to use force. But work is scalar product of force and shift, so in this case it seems to be zero. Do we need energy to "generate" force which keeps something in fixed possition?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. Same as pushing against a sturdy wall. Maintaining muscle tension requires metabolism to use up calories but doesn't yield more potential energy so physically you don't do work.
 
Vicol said:
But work is scalar product of force and shift, so in this case it seems to be zero.
The mechanical work done on the object is zero, as there is no displacement.

Vicol said:
Do we need energy to "generate" force which keeps something in fixed possition?
Yes we do, as we are biological systems. It requires chemical energy ("food") for us to keep our muscles under tension.

Of course, you could just place the object on a shelf. :wink:
 
Our muslces work like spring, don't they? I thought we lose energy only to squeeze spring, not to mantain it squeezed :)
 
Vicol said:
Our muslces work like spring, don't they?
Not really. Your muscle fibers continually contract and relax to maintain tension. That takes chemical energy.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top