Why do we observe only microwaves in the background radiation?

AI Thread Summary
The Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) radiation is predominantly observed in the microwave range due to the expansion of the universe, which has stretched the wavelengths from their original emission at about 3,000 kelvin. Initially, this radiation included visible light, but over 13 billion years, it has shifted to longer wavelengths. The CMB is a result of black body radiation from the early universe, and its intensity is now too low to be distinguished from noise by detection devices. Even if the CMB were in the visible spectrum, it would likely remain too faint to be seen, leaving the night sky black. The discussion highlights the challenges of detecting faint background radiation and the effects of cosmic expansion on electromagnetic radiation.
genefalk
Messages
13
Reaction score
1
Why aren't the other bands (visible, UV, etc.) in the electromagnetic spectrum also seen today as part of the background radiation?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
When the CMB was first emitted, the plasma filling all of space was at a temperature of around 3,000 kelvin and much of the radiation was in the visible range. However, over the last 13 billion years the expansion of space has stretched out the radiation until the wavelengths now fall mostly in the microwave range.
 
  • Like
Likes 2 people
The CMB is now stretched by a factor of 1090, as Drakkith noted. That 3000K emission is the only known EM radiation source in the universe at age 380,000 years.
 
If you are familiar with the theory of black body radiation, you realize that at a given temperature all matter radiates a broad spectrum of emr. Since any detection device is comprised of matter, there is an intensity of emr which is simply not differentiable from equipment noise. (not to mention external sources). Take a look at the recent report from antarctica on the CMB polarization. It took them 3 years to make sure what they thought they were seeing wasn't an artifact. Basically, its the same reason as why we couldn't see the meteor that struck Russia (till it was right on top of us) ...its called "glare".
 
If the background radiation that we see today were in the visible range (for example red), would the night sky be red instead of black?
 
genefalk said:
If the background radiation that we see today were in the visible range (for example red), would the night sky be red instead of black?

The light would still be very faint, as there's very little energy density of the CMB now. I doubt you would be able to see it even if it was in the visible spectrum.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...

Similar threads

Back
Top