Why do we use covariant formulation in classical electrodynamics?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter m_prakash02
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Classical Covariant
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the use of covariant formulation in classical electrodynamics, specifically in writing Maxwell's equations. Covariant formulation utilizes tensors, allowing for both covariant and contravariant tensors as necessary. The Faraday tensor is presented as an exact two-form, expressed as $$F=\mathrm{d} \wedge A$$, where the four-potential ##A## is a one-form. The recommended resource for further understanding is Volume 2 of Landau and Lifshitz's "Classical Field Theory," which also serves as an introduction to General Relativity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of tensor calculus
  • Familiarity with Maxwell's equations
  • Knowledge of differential forms
  • Basic principles of General Relativity
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of covariant and contravariant tensors
  • Explore the derivation and implications of the Faraday tensor
  • Read Landau and Lifshitz's "Classical Field Theory" for a relativity-first approach
  • Investigate the least-action principle in the context of electrodynamics
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for graduate physics students, researchers in classical electrodynamics, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of electromagnetic theory.

m_prakash02
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
Why exactly do we use only covariant formulation to write Maxwell's equations? Is there a specific reason?
I am a graduate physics student currently studying electrodynamics as a core paper. I want to know why exactly do we use only covariant formulation for writing Maxwell's equations? Or do we also use contravariant formulation (i.e., if something like that even exists)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Using metric tensor a covariant formula is written as a contra variant formula and vice versa.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: m_prakash02
I'd say the most "natural" understanding of the Faraday tensor is as an exact two-form,
$$F=\mathrm{d} \wedge A,$$
where the four-potential ##A## is understood as a one-form.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: m_prakash02
m_prakash02 said:
TL;DR Summary: Why exactly do we use only covariant formulation to write Maxwell's equations? Is there a specific reason?

I want to know why exactly do we use only covariant formulation for writing Maxwell's equations? Or do we also use contravariant formulation (i.e., if something like that even exists)?
“Covariant formulation” just means using tensors. You can use both covariant and contra variant tensors as needed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: m_prakash02, vanhees71 and Ibix
Dale said:
“Covariant formulation” just means using tensors. You can use both covariant and contra variant tensors as needed.
Thanks for the reply! Could you please suggest me some resources for further reading?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
The best "relativity-first approach" to classical electrodynamics imho is Vol. 2 of Landau and Lifshitz (Classical Field Theory). It's also a very nice intro to General Relativity.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: m_prakash02, Dale and PeroK
covariance is a common feature of least-action-principle generated equations
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: m_prakash02 and vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
620
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K