Why does (-1)^2 equal both 1 and -1?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathelord
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion surrounding the equation (-1)^2 equating to both 1 and -1. It highlights that e^[i*pi] equals -1, while e^[2i*pi] equals 1, leading to a misunderstanding when taking logarithms, which can yield multiple values. The error arises from misapplying the logarithmic function by not considering the integer k in the expression ln(1) = 2kπi. This results in the incorrect conclusion that i equals 0, creating a paradox. Ultimately, the conversation emphasizes the importance of recognizing the multivalued nature of logarithms in complex analysis.
mathelord
HI, since e^[i*pi]=-1,then e^[2i*pi]=1.
taking lin of both sides,2*i*pi=0,that makes i=0
squaring both sides,you get -1 to equal 0.
Is there a problem with what i have done,and what is it?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
When complex outputs are allowed, logarithms become multivalued. In this case, the correct formulae are :

e^{2k\pi i} = 1, \ln(1) = 2k\pi i where k ranges over the integers.

In your case, you're confusing the result for k = 0 with k = 1, hence the apparent paradox.
 
Last edited:
Yes and:

(-1)^2 = 1 \quad 1^2 = 1 \quad 1 = - 1 \quad 2 = 0

It's the same things really :rolleyes:
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top