Why Does a Charged Disk Generate a Non-Zero Electric Field at Its Center?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hell-hawk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electromagnetism
AI Thread Summary
A charged disk generates a non-zero electric field at its center due to the cumulative effect of its infinitesimal rings, despite the cancellation of forces from opposite charges on each ring. Each ring contributes to the electric field at the center, and when considering the entire disk, the contributions do not fully cancel out, resulting in a finite electric field. The reasoning that each ring's charges cancel each other is flawed because it overlooks the overall contribution from all rings combined. Additionally, introducing a point charge at the center would create a measurable electric field, reinforcing the idea that the disk behaves similarly to a point charge at that location. Understanding these concepts clarifies the behavior of electric fields in charged configurations.
hell-hawk
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have two questions.
The first concerns a charged disk. Consider the center of the surface of the charged disk, O. Mathematically, the value of E at O comes out to be a non-zero finite value. However i am having difficulty linking this with the physical sense. The disk can be thought to be composed of an infinite number of rings; i think that each ring will set up zero electric field at O since for each charge element on the ring, the diametrically opposite charge element of the charge element cancels its effect. So how come does E come out to be non-zero at O? Please explain the flaw in my reasoning in physical terms, not mathematical.
The second question involves two charges. Consider one charge to be fixed, while the other moves past it in a straight line. What fields will be set up?
What force, if any, will act on each of the charges?
Please help. I'll be highly grateful.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hell-hawk said:
I have two questions.
The first concerns a charged disk. Consider the center of the surface of the charged disk, O. Mathematically, the value of E at O comes out to be a non-zero finite value. However i am having difficulty linking this with the physical sense. The disk can be thought to be composed of an infinite number of rings; i think that each ring will set up zero electric field at O since for each charge element on the ring, the diametrically opposite charge element of the charge element cancels its effect. So how come does E come out to be non-zero at O? Please explain the flaw in my reasoning in physical terms, not mathematical.

What if I put a point charge at O? Do you still expect to measure a non-zero E-field there? If you do, then no matter how many of these rings you add, even if the fields for these rings cancel, you will have a net field from this point charge at O. So you should think of a disk as being assembled by all of these rings, except that the ring of infinitesimal diameter at the origin approaches that of a point charge.

Zz.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top