Why does a flamethrower not explode?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lokifenrir96
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
A flamethrower does not explode because the fuel it expels lacks an oxidizer, which is necessary for combustion, preventing the flame from traveling back to the fuel container. Additionally, the speed of the fuel stream is greater than the rate at which the flame can propagate, ensuring the ignition point moves away from the operator. These two factors work together to maintain safety during operation. Understanding these principles clarifies why flamethrowers can function without risk of explosion. The design effectively mitigates the potential for backfire incidents.
lokifenrir96
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
To be more specific, why is it that when the flammable gas or liquid is pumped through the barrel and ignited at the end of the barrel, the flame does not spread backwards along the stream of liquid/gas into the fuel container and cause an explosion?

Is it simply because of the high pressure at which the fuel is pumped out? Or is there another reason, or a safety mechanism to prevent this from occurring?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Two factors. Most important is that fuel in flame thrower doesn't contain oxidizer. It needs oxygen in air to burn. So it can't burn until it is expelled.

Second is that the stream typically travels faster than flame can propagate along the stream. So the ignition point is actually carried away from the operator.
 
Well-explained, thanks!
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top