Why does a flamethrower not explode?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lokifenrir96
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
A flamethrower does not explode because the fuel it expels lacks an oxidizer, which is necessary for combustion, preventing the flame from traveling back to the fuel container. Additionally, the speed of the fuel stream is greater than the rate at which the flame can propagate, ensuring the ignition point moves away from the operator. These two factors work together to maintain safety during operation. Understanding these principles clarifies why flamethrowers can function without risk of explosion. The design effectively mitigates the potential for backfire incidents.
lokifenrir96
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
To be more specific, why is it that when the flammable gas or liquid is pumped through the barrel and ignited at the end of the barrel, the flame does not spread backwards along the stream of liquid/gas into the fuel container and cause an explosion?

Is it simply because of the high pressure at which the fuel is pumped out? Or is there another reason, or a safety mechanism to prevent this from occurring?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Two factors. Most important is that fuel in flame thrower doesn't contain oxidizer. It needs oxygen in air to burn. So it can't burn until it is expelled.

Second is that the stream typically travels faster than flame can propagate along the stream. So the ignition point is actually carried away from the operator.
 
Well-explained, thanks!
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Back
Top