Separating hydrogen from effluent HHO by gravity.

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of separating hydrogen from HHO gas produced during the charging of lead-acid batteries, particularly in the context of utilizing this gas for energy storage. Participants explore various methods of gas separation and the practicality of capturing hydrogen for later use, considering both theoretical and practical implications.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes using a column to separate hydrogen and oxygen based on their density, suggesting that hydrogen would collect at the top while oxygen sinks to the bottom.
  • Another participant suggests using an electrolysis device powered by a photovoltaic panel to directly capture separated hydrogen and oxygen gases, arguing this would be more efficient.
  • A participant expresses skepticism about the practicality of capturing enough hydrogen from lead-acid batteries, indicating that the gas production may be minimal and not useful.
  • One participant mentions having researched the gas emission rates of lead-acid batteries and found that gas production increases as the battery approaches full charge.
  • Another participant challenges the relevance of the volume of gas produced, suggesting that the energy harvested is equally insignificant if the gas output is low.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the practicality and efficiency of separating hydrogen from HHO gas produced by lead-acid batteries. While some acknowledge the potential for capturing wasted energy, others doubt the feasibility due to low gas production rates. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the effectiveness of the proposed methods.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations related to the quantity of gas produced by lead-acid batteries and the challenges in effectively separating hydrogen from oxygen. There is also mention of the need for quantification in assessing the efficacy of the separation process.

Jeff-AC4AQ
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I'm would like to learn of the practicality of separating HHO gas released from a photovoltaic charged lead-acid battery bank for hydrogen storage, perhaps by exploiting the substantial difference in density of the two elemental gases.
It occurred to me that were the gas emitted from batteries collected by means of tubing leading to a manifold, and then to a column, the hydrogen will tend to collect at the top of the column and the oxygen will sink to the bottom. Electronic hydrogen detectors near the top of the column would control a servo controlled valve and positive displacement pump, with the concentrated hydrogen passing through a catalytic mesh to strip the remaining oxygen before high-pressure storage.
I believe there must be a reason why this would not achieve the desired results but I'm unable to put my finger on it. Preventing the recombination of the HHO before separation is a must for safety, even though the quantities are small. Use of non-reactive material which does not accumulate static charges will make things unlikely to go bang in the night.
Any thoughts on this would be appreciated, Jeff
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Why don't you just run an electrolysis device using a photovoltaic panel and directly capture the H2 and O2 gases at each electrode? That way it's already separated when you capture it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Bystander
Drakkith said:
Why don't you just run an electrolysis device using a photovoltaic panel and directly capture the H2 and O2 gases at each electrode? That way it's already separated when you capture it.
I've considered doing just that with excess energy from the photovoltaic array. However, my objective is to learn whether an energy stream which is usually wasted can be saved for later use, perhaps as one resource among others to bridge the "January Gap" when photovoltaic output is low and electrical demand (mostly from my geothermal heat pump) is high. Also, I recognize the limitations present in hydrogen storage and conversion of hydrogen to electrical power, so this scheme is likely to be of marginal value.
Thanks for your thoughts on this, Jeff
 
Jeff-AC4AQ said:
my objective is to learn whether an energy stream which is usually wasted can be saved for later use

Saving wasted energy is good. But I think you will be disappointed by how little hydrogen is produced by the lead-acid battery.

If you are going to work with engineering ideas, then you must start doing it with numbers, not just principles and theories. Do a little research and find out how long it would take a lead-acid battery to produce 1 m3 of H.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
Jeff-AC4AQ said:
I've considered doing just that with excess energy from the photovoltaic array. However, my objective is to learn whether an energy stream which is usually wasted can be saved for later use, perhaps as one resource among others to bridge the "January Gap" when photovoltaic output is low and electrical demand (mostly from my geothermal heat pump) is high. Also, I recognize the limitations present in hydrogen storage and conversion of hydrogen to electrical power, so this scheme is likely to be of marginal value.
Thanks for your thoughts on this, Jeff

There shouldn't be enough gas produced to be useful. If there is, you need new batteries. :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
Drakkith said:
There shouldn't be enough gas produced to be useful. If there is, you need new batteries. :wink:
Thank you both for your responses. As a matter of fact, before considering this scheme I searched online until I was able to find the formula to calculate the quantity of HHO gas emitted by lead-acid cells during a charging cycle. Not too easy to find, but I discovered it in a battery manufacturer's webpage on determining the ventilation capacity needed for rooms where lead-acid batteries are charged. It included the function of gas emission vs. increasing state of charge (low initially and for much of the cycle, becoming high as full charge is approached).
Also, the only aspect of my original question where quantification would be appropriate would be the efficacy of separation, i.e. percentage of gases other than hydrogen in the product. The matter of whether the process volume is 10 mL or 1 cubic meter per day is extraneous.
Thanks again for the advice, de AC4AQ
 
Jeff-AC4AQ said:
The matter of whether the process volume is 10 mL or 1 cubic meter per day is extraneous.

Them it is also extraneous whether your energy harvesting harvests one joule or one millijoule.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
Replies
13
Views
3K