Why does an electron not stick to the nucleus?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter icecubebeast
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electron Nucleus
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the question of why electrons do not collapse into the nucleus despite the attractive electrostatic forces between their negative charge and the positive charge of the nucleus. It explores theoretical models, particularly the Bohr model and quantum mechanics, and addresses concepts like the uncertainty principle and electron behavior in atomic structures.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that the Bohr model is an outdated representation and does not accurately describe electron behavior, emphasizing the quantum mechanical model which provides probabilities rather than trajectories.
  • One participant suggests that the uncertainty principle explains why electrons do not stick to the nucleus, as being confined would lead to high kinetic energy due to large momentum uncertainty.
  • Another participant mentions that there is a small probability of electrons being found inside the nucleus, referencing a phenomenon known as electron capture in certain isotopes.
  • Repeated inquiries about why electrons remain at a distance from the nucleus indicate a desire for deeper understanding of the underlying principles.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the adequacy of the Bohr model versus the quantum mechanical model, and there is no consensus on a singular explanation for why electrons do not collapse into the nucleus. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations include the dependence on interpretations of quantum mechanics, the implications of the uncertainty principle, and the specific conditions under which phenomena like electron capture occur. These aspects are not fully resolved within the discussion.

icecubebeast
Messages
66
Reaction score
3
If the electrons are negative charged and nucleus is positively charged, then why do electrons still orbit around the nucleus at a distance and not just stick to the nucleus?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Bohr atom and little tiny charged marbles "orbiting" one another like a miniature solar system is NOT a reflection of what is actually happening; it WAS a model that was used well over a century ago to investigate certain initial hypotheses of the mechanics of very small systems. The current quantum mechanical model of interactions of electrons with atomic nuclei gives you ONLY the probability of finding an electron at a certain distance "r" in a certain direction θ, φ from the nucleus. It does not describe an orbital trajectory.
 
Bystander said:
The Bohr atom and little tiny charged marbles "orbiting" one another like a miniature solar system is NOT a reflection of what is actually happening; it WAS a model that was used well over a century ago to investigate certain initial hypotheses of the mechanics of very small systems. The current quantum mechanical model of interactions of electrons with atomic nuclei gives you ONLY the probability of finding an electron at a certain distance "r" in a certain direction θ, φ from the nucleus. It does not describe an orbital trajectory.
But why does the electron stay at a distance away from the nucleus instead of sticking?
 
icecubebeast said:
But why does the electron stay at a distance away from the nucleus instead of sticking?
It is due to the uncertainty principle. If the electron is stuck to the nucleus then the uncertainty in its position is very small so the uncertainty in its momentum is very large. This in turn means that the average kinetic energy is high. Since an atom likes to be in a low-energy state it will give off energy to go to a state where the position is more uncertain and the momentum less uncertain.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: icecubebeast
Bystander said:
The current quantum mechanical model of interactions of electrons with atomic nuclei gives you ONLY the probability of finding an electron at a certain distance "r" in a certain direction θ, φ from the nucleus.

In fact, an atomic electron generally does have a small probability of being located inside the nucleus (very small distance r from the center of the atom/nucleus). In certain isotopes, this produces a type of nuclear decay called electron capture.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron_capture
 
icecubebeast said:
If the electrons are negative charged and nucleus is positively charged, then why do electrons still orbit around the nucleus at a distance and not just stick to the nucleus?

This is a good time to introduce to you, if you haven't discover it already, the https://www.physicsforums.com/forums/physics-faq.209/ , and https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/why-dont-electrons-crash-into-the-nucleus-in-atoms.511179/ in particular.

Zz.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K