Why Does Angular Velocity Reach 24 rad/s in This Motion Equation Problem?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a problem involving a slender uniform rigid arm subjected to a moment about the z-axis, with a focus on understanding the angular velocity reaching 24 rad/s. The equations of motion derived from the setup indicate that the angular velocity is primarily influenced by the applied moment, which varies over time. Participants suggest checking the math by analyzing the total change in momentum through the area of the force-time graph and considering the use of polar coordinates for clarity. The rapid increase in the linear velocity component (u) is attributed to the high applied moment, prompting questions about expected values and assumptions. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of mathematical accuracy and the relationship between applied forces and resulting motion.
boeing_737
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am having a little bit of conceptual trouble with this problem and would appreciate your help. The problem setup is given in the figure. Let's say we have a slender uniform rigid arm(mass m, length l) in space, with a coordinate system B attached to the left end of the arm as shown. C is the center of mass of the arm. We have a moment M_{z_b} acting about the \hat{z}_{b} axis.

physics_forums_fig.png


Let (u,v,w) and (p,q,r) be the inertial velocity and inertial angular velocity vectors expressed in B. I get the scalar equations of motion as (assuming that the angular velocity is only along \hat{z}_b):

m \dot{u} - \frac{ml}{2} r^2 = F_{x_b}
m \dot{v} + \frac{ml}{2} \dot{r} = F_{y_b}
m \dot{w} = F_{z_b}

0 = M_{x_b}
-\frac{ml}{2} \dot{w} = M_{y_b}
\frac{ml^2}{3} \dot{r} + \frac{ml}{2} \dot{v} = M_{z_b}

The applied moment is given as : M_{z_b}(t) = 160 \left(1 - \cos \left(\frac{2 \pi t}{15} \right) \right). For t > 15, M_{z_b} = 0. See figure below :
physics_forums_fig2.jpg


Integrating these equations using MATLAB's ode45, I get the following plot :
physics_forums_fig3.jpg


From the above figure :
1) There is only one component of angular velocity (yaw rate) which is as expected. But is the magnitude correct (ie should it reach 24 rad/s)?

2) I am not able to figure out what's going on with u. Why is it increasing so rapidly?

Any help would be really appreciated.

yogesh
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
1. it's your math.
The total change in momentum is the area of the force-time graph ... so you can check.
I don't know why you are not doing this in polar coordinates.

2. I imagine because the moment is quite high.
Have you got any reason to expect u to increase less rapidly?
What sort of value were you expecting and why?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top