Why Does Changing the Order of Integration Affect the Integral Result?

  • Thread starter Thread starter engin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mistake
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a double integral involving the sine function and the order of integration. The original poster presents a specific integral over a defined region and explores the implications of changing the order of integration on the result.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to evaluate a double integral and questions the correctness of their result after changing the order of integration. Some participants question the bounds of the substitution used in the integral.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the original poster's reasoning, with some expressing agreement with the calculations while others are clarifying the substitution process. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of the order of integration and the resulting bounds.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of a discrepancy between the calculated result and an answer provided in a worksheet, indicating potential confusion or differing interpretations of the integral's evaluation.

engin
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
(Double integral on D) sin[((x^3)/3) - x] dxdy = ? where
D={(x,y): 1<=y<=4 , sqrt(y)<=x<=2 }.

Okay, we change the order of integration and then we get

(Double integral on D') sin [((x^3)/3) - x] dxdy where
D'={(x,y): 1<=x<=2 , 1<=y<=(x^2). Thus, we get the one variable integral

(Integral from x=1 to x=2) (x^2 - 1)* sin[((x^3)/3) - x]dx.

Letting u = ((x^3)/3) converts the integral to

(Integral from u=-2/3 to u=2/3) sin(u)du = 0. So where is the mistake?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Isn't this correct?
 
Shouldn't the substitution be u = x^3/3 - x? Which would make the bounds in u space be -2/3 to 5/3?

Edit: Nevermind, -2/3 to 2/3 is the correct bounds.
 
Last edited:
Pardon, the substitution is of course u = x^3/3 - x but i have found the integral 0. The answer in the worksheet is different though.
 
Last edited:
Woops... I see no problem with your work, and it looks like the integral should indeed be 0.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K