Why Does Diffraction Treat Every Point on an Aperture as a Point Source?

  • Thread starter Thread starter HomogenousCow
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of diffraction and the integration of fields from an aperture to determine the total field at a specific point. It highlights the application of Huygens' principle, which states that each point on a wavefront acts as a point source for subsequent wave propagation. The user expresses confusion about why every point on the aperture is treated as a point source. This approach is fundamental in understanding wave behavior and diffraction patterns. The conversation emphasizes the importance of integrating contributions from all points in the aperture to accurately calculate the resulting field.
HomogenousCow
Messages
736
Reaction score
213
I was reading about diffraction on this page http://www.thefouriertransform.com/applications/diffraction2.php

Now everything was fine up til the point where he said:

"Now, if we want to know the total field at point Z, then we need to add together every point in the aperture. That is, we need to integrate across the aperture to get the field at point Z. To get this, we'll have to know a little more physics. Specifically, the fields from a point source can be modeled as:"

As I understand it, he is treating every point on the aperture as a point source, I do not understand why this is so.

(Btw, does anyone like the username, couldn't do spherical cow so had to think of something else physicists always use to simplify problems)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
HomogenousCow said:
As I understand it, he is treating every point on the aperture as a point source, I do not understand why this is so.
That's essentially Huygens' principle--that each point on a wavefront can be considered as a point source for finding the subsequent position of the wave.
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top