Why does gravitational wave research get DoD funding?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the reasons behind the Department of Defense's (DoD) funding of gravitational wave research, exploring the motivations and implications of such funding within the broader context of scientific research and political considerations.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express confusion about the DoD's interest in gravitational wave research, questioning its relevance to military applications.
  • Others note that the DoD funds a wide range of scientific fields, suggesting that science is part of its mandate.
  • There is speculation that the DoD may be interested in precise gravitometry, which could enhance GPS accuracy and inertial navigation.
  • One participant argues that political pressures lead researchers to seek DoD funding, as civilian research budgets are often cut, and defense spending remains politically sensitive.
  • A participant references a recent event where the CIA donated satellites to NASA, implying a connection between defense and civilian scientific funding.
  • Some participants caution against politicizing the discussion, emphasizing a desire to focus on the scientific aspects rather than partisan views.
  • A question is raised about whether the DoD funds pure science research without immediate applications, indicating a curiosity about the nature of such funding.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the motivations behind DoD funding for gravitational wave research, with multiple competing views and uncertainties expressed throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

The discussion reflects a mix of opinions on the intersection of defense funding and scientific research, with underlying political dynamics influencing perceptions and motivations.

TomServo
Messages
281
Reaction score
9
Question in the subject.

I have no idea what the DoD's interest is in this. Sorry is this is the wrong forum.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The DoD funds a lot of science, not just gravitational waves. Life sciences, social sciences, hard sciences, you name it. Science is part of its mandate, oddly enough.
 
Okay...but presumably they have a military application in mind or something?
 
They might have interest in very precise gravitometry. This would improve GPS accuracy, as well as inertial navigation and many more things.
 
While civilian research budgets are cut, politicians don't want to be called unpatriotic for cutting the defense budget. That is why many researchers are forced to apply for DoD funding, and propose some potentially defense related applications. At the end it's all tax-payer's money, but for political reasons it is funneled though the DoD.

Recently CIA donated to the NASA two Hubble-quality satellites, they happened to have lying around somewhere as spare ones.
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/technol...-gives-nasa-two-hubble-quality-212803111.html
That's gives you an idea about civilian vs. defense funding.
 
TomServo said:
Okay...but presumably they have a military application in mind or something?

No, not necessarily. That's why I said "oddly enough".
 
...politicians don't want to be called unpatriotic for cutting the defense budget.

Since when do liberals NOT cut defense budgets...witness 'SEQUESTER' requirements from the current administration as an example.
 
Before this thread devolves into politics let me say that I usually vote Republican or Libertarian and I'm all for cutting defense spending, so let's not have a liberal vs conservative bash.

Does the DoD ever fund pure science research with no foreseeable applications just to advance science?
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K