Why does i(t)=dq(t)/dt give the value of AC current only?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the interpretation of the equation i(t) = dq(t)/dt in the context of alternating current (AC) and direct current (DC). Participants explore whether this equation is applicable to both types of current and seek a physical understanding of its implications.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that the equation i(t) = dq(t)/dt is valid for both AC and DC currents, citing examples such as a single electron pump for DC.
  • Others challenge this view, arguing that if a constant current flows, the rate of change of charge (dq/dt) would be zero, leading to a contradiction in the application of the equation.
  • One participant emphasizes the distinction between the rate of charge flow and the rate of change of charge flow, suggesting that confusion arises from mixing these concepts.
  • Another participant introduces the concept of current density and relates it to the equation, arguing that even for a constant DC current, dq/dt represents the charge crossing a reference surface over time.
  • A later reply acknowledges a misunderstanding regarding the interpretation of charge flow versus current flow, clarifying that the charge count is cumulative over time.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the applicability of the equation to AC and DC currents, with no consensus reached on the interpretation of dq/dt in this context.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the importance of understanding units and the distinction between charge flow and current flow, indicating that assumptions about these concepts may lead to confusion.

gikiian
Messages
98
Reaction score
0
I know the mathematical and geometrical reason, but does there exist a physical interpretation behind this?

Thanks :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am not sure what you mean.
That formula works for DC as well. An "exotic" example would be a single electron pump where the (dc) current is given by the number of electrons pumped per second...
 
f95toli said:
I am not sure what you mean.
That formula works for DC as well. An "exotic" example would be a single electron pump where the (dc) current is given by the number of electrons pumped per second...

I don't believe it does. Say that a constant 10 Coulombs of charge per second is flowing through a conductor. This would be equivalent of 10 Amps of current. The rate of change in Coulombs per second is zero. So the equation i(t)=dq(t)/dt would yield zero also.
 
2milehi said:
I don't believe it does. Say that a constant 10 Coulombs of charge per second is flowing through a conductor. This would be equivalent of 10 Amps of current. The rate of change in Coulombs per second is zero. So the equation i(t)=dq(t)/dt would yield zero also.
!? The rate at which charges move is dq/dt. That is the current. You appear to be confusing dq/dt with d2q/dt2. The rate of change of charge flow is not the same as the rate of charge flow.

AM
 
2milehi said:
This would be equivalent of 10 Amps of current.

No, it is 10 amps of current.
 
Andrew Mason said:
!? The rate at which charges move is dq/dt. That is the current. You appear to be confusing dq/dt with d2q/dt2. The rate of change of charge flow is not the same as the rate of charge flow.

AM

Say at t = 2 seconds there is 10 Coulombs flowing in the conductor, at t = 3 seconds there is 10 Coulombs flowing in the conductor. A simplified way of figuring dq/dt would be (10 - 10) / (3 - 2) = 0. A slope of a horizontal line is always zero.

d2q/dt2 is the rate of change of the rate of change.
 
Last edited:
Say at t = 2 seconds there is 10 Coulombs flowing in the conductor

There is or there are?

But no, there are 10 coulombs per second flowing.

If you re-examine your units you will understand what everyone is telling you.
 
2milehi said:
I don't believe it does. Say that a constant 10 Coulombs of charge per second is flowing through a conductor. This would be equivalent of 10 Amps of current. The rate of change in Coulombs per second is zero. So the equation i(t)=dq(t)/dt would yield zero also.

It helps if you think in terms of current DENSITY at first:
J = ρ.v = ρ.(dx/dt)

Now consider a cross-section of your conductor and perform a surface integral, the result:
I = (dq/dx) (dx/dt) = dq/dt

So the proper interpretation of the dq/dt term is the rate of charges that cross a certain reference surface. So even for a DC current of, say, 10 A, then every second 10 C cross that surface.
 
Studiot said:
There is or there are?

But no, there are 10 coulombs per second flowing.

If you re-examine your units you will understand what everyone is telling you.

OK I get it now. I was thinking in terms of current flow, not charge flow. At t=2, 20 coulombs have flown through a conductor. At t=3 30 coulombs have flown through a conductor. So (30 - 20) / (3 - 2) = 10 coulombs per second. The coulomb count is accumulative.

Sorry for the confusion (and bad grammar) - watching a two-year old can cause a lack of concentration.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K