Why Does Integration by Parts Yield Extra Δk in Wave Packet Analysis?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the integration of a wave packet in introductory quantum mechanics, specifically focusing on the integral representation of a wave function at time t=0. Participants are examining the limits of integration and the implications of integration by parts in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to apply integration by parts to the integral of a cosine function. There are questions about the correct limits of integration and the treatment of constants during the integration process.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the proper notation for the integral and have confirmed that certain variables can be treated as constants. However, there is ongoing confusion regarding the transition from the integrated form to the expected result, with multiple interpretations being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the specifics of trigonometric identities and their application in the context of wave packets. There is a noted concern about potential mistakes in reasoning and the implications for understanding the material.

ibysaiyan
Messages
441
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi ,

I am reading a little on introductory QM , initial chapters on waves.
They have given an integral for a wavepacket , assuming at t= 0.
Which is: ψ(x,0) = \int A cosk'x dk' (I don't know how to define limits to the integral in Latex upper = k+Δk , lower limit = k-Δk)
which gives ψ(x,0) = S(x)coskx , where S (x) = 2AΔK sin(Δkx)/(Δkx).

Homework Equations



Integration by parts ?

The Attempt at a Solution


Now I am totally brain stuck , it surely can't be anything complex so I should be able to do it by parts.
Let u =cosk'x and dv = dk'

Or am I overlooking something ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ibysaiyan said:

Homework Statement


Hi ,

I am reading a little on introductory QM , initial chapters on waves.
They have given an integral for a wavepacket , assuming at t= 0.
Which is: ψ(x,0) = \int A cosk'x dk' (I don't know how to define limits to the integral in Latex upper = k+Δk , lower limit = k-Δk)
which gives ψ(x,0) = S(x)coskx , where S (x) = 2AΔK sin(Δkx)/(Δkx).

Homework Equations



Integration by parts ?

The Attempt at a Solution


Now I am totally brain stuck , it surely can't be anything complex so I should be able to do it by parts.
Let u =cosk'x and dv = dk'

Or am I overlooking something ?
Yeah, it's just a straightforward integration. Remember x acts like a constant here because you're integrating with respect to k'. When you integrate cos k'x, you get sin k'x/x.
 
ibysaiyan said:
\int A cosk'x dk' (I don't know how to define limits to the integral in Latex upper = k+Δk , lower limit = k-Δk)
You can look at the code in this post to see how to write the integral with limits.
\int_{k-\Delta k}^{k+\Delta k} A\cos k'x\,dk' You also want a backslash before cos to get the function name to typeset correctly, and a little space (\,) before dk' makes it look better.
 
It really is simple. x is constant during integration.
 
Thanks for the responses everyone but I still don't get it.
\int_{k-\Delta k}^{k+\Delta k} A\cos k'x\,dk'
As it has been mentioned that X and A are constant, so I end up with :

Asink'x/x but when I plug in the limits I get:

2Asin(Δkx)/x... how do they end up with the cos. identity ?
 
ibysaiyan said:
Thanks for the responses everyone but I still don't get it.
\int_{k-\Delta k}^{k+\Delta k} A\cos k'x\,dk'
As it has been mentioned that X and A are constant, so I end up with :

Asink'x/x but when I plug in the limits I get:

2Asin(Δkx)/x... how do they end up with the cos. identity ?
After you integrate, you have
$$\left.\frac{A}{x}\sin k'x\right|_{k-\Delta k}^{k+\Delta k} = \frac{A}{x}[\sin ((k+\Delta k)x) - \sin((k-\Delta k)x)].$$ How did you manage to go from this last expression to what you got?
 
Last edited:
vela said:
After you integrate, you have
$$\left.\frac{A}{x}\sin k'x\right|_{k-\Delta k}^{k+\Delta k} = \frac{A}{x}[\sin ((k+\Delta k)x) - \sin((k-\Delta k)x)].$$ How did you manage to go from this last expression to what you got?

Yes. I did get the above step after which I expanded the brackets , which resulted in the cancelling of -kx +kx terms , right ?
 
Are you claiming that sin(a+b)-sin(a-b) = 2 sin b by simply subracting the arguments of the sines?
 
Last edited:
vela said:
Are you claiming that sin(a+b)-sin(a-b) = 2 sin b by simply subracting the arguments of the sines?

Oh no, I was greatly mistaken !
I just realized sum formula is all I need...

I feel so stupid :

Just how the hell am I going to become a physicist if I keep doing such silly mistakes...
 
  • #10
Ok.. so I have just used the identified that I previously mentioned.. I still don't end up with the form in the OP.


$$\left.\frac{A}{x}\sin k'x\right|_{k-\Delta k}^{k+\Delta k} = \frac{A}{x}[\sin ((k+\Delta k)x) - \sin((k-\Delta k)x)].$$

Now sin (a+b) = sinAcosB+sinBcosA , sin (a-b) = sinAcosB-sinBcosA

I used the above to only end up with

2A sin(Δkx) coskx / x

They seem to have two extra Δk for some reason..
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K