Why Does Light Interference Differ from Sound Interference?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Janiceleong26
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interference Sound
AI Thread Summary
Light interference differs from sound interference primarily due to the nature of wave propagation and amplitude behavior. While sound waves can experience amplitude decrease over distance, coherent light sources maintain consistent intensity at maxima, leading to uniform brightness. The intensity at minima for light is zero, contrasting with sound where interference patterns can vary based on amplitude differences. The discussion highlights confusion over graphical representations of these phenomena and the impact of speaker distance relative to wavelength. Overall, the differences in interference patterns between light and sound stem from their distinct wave properties and coherence.
Janiceleong26
Messages
276
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


image.jpg


Homework Equations


I α A2

The Attempt at a Solution


My teacher told us that if the source is a light source, then the answer would be B, why? Why would the intensity be the same for each maxima? And zero intensity when at minima? I thought its amplitude will decrease as it travels further, which means one wave have a larger amplitude than the other, just like this situation. So intensity of each maxima should decrease just like sound I assume..And the graph should look like D as well :oldconfused: (the answer for this question is D)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think any of the pictures are really accurate. it's a bit tricky because the overall picture will depend on how the distance between the speakers compares with the wavelength.
Also, it's unclear whether you are supposed to consider what happens beyond the closest approaches to the two speakers. X and Y do seem to be a bit further out, but as you go out there the minima will get deeper, not shallower.
But to answer your question, I do not know why your teacher says the graph for (coherent) light sources would be different.
 
  • Like
Likes Janiceleong26
haruspex said:
I don't think any of the pictures are really accurate. it's a bit tricky because the overall picture will depend on how the distance between the speakers compares with the wavelength.
Also, it's unclear whether you are supposed to consider what happens beyond the closest approaches to the two speakers. X and Y do seem to be a bit further out, but as you go out there the minima will get deeper, not shallower.
But to answer your question, I do not know why your teacher says the graph for (coherent) light sources would be different.
I see, thanks for your time
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top