Why Does Light Lose Energy with Universe Expansion?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sancharsharma
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cosmological Light
sancharsharma
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Can anyone please explain the physical reason of why is light losing energy as universe is expanding?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you give a reference to that statement?
 
sancharsharma said:
Can anyone please explain the physical reason of why is light losing energy as universe is expanding?
A simple way to look at is that the expansion is stretching the light waves. Longer wavelength is equivalent to lower energy.
 
@mathman,
But the wavelength of light is not merely a distance between two points. As a support it doesn't follow lorentz length contraction. It is distance per cycle.
So are you sure that it is a valid argument to say that wavelength expands as universe expands?
 
sancharsharma said:
@mathman,
But the wavelength of light is not merely a distance between two points. As a support it doesn't follow lorentz length contraction. It is distance per cycle.

Cosmological expansion isn't the same thing as Lorentz contraction.

sancharsharma said:
So are you sure that it is a valid argument to say that wavelength expands as universe expands?

It is valid to describe cosmological Doppler shifts verbally as kinematic Doppler shifts, and it is also valid to describe them verbally as being due to the expansion of space. These are just two different ways of talking about the mathematics of general relativity.
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
Thread 'Relativity of simultaneity in actuality'
I’m attaching two figures from the book, Basic concepts in relativity and QT, by Resnick and Halliday. They are describing the relativity of simultaneity from a theoretical pov, which I understand. Basically, the lightning strikes at AA’ and BB’ can be deemed simultaneous either in frame S, in which case they will not be simultaneous in frame S’, and vice versa. Only in one of the frames are the two events simultaneous, but not in both, and this claim of simultaneity can be done by either of...
Back
Top