Why does low energy neutrons favor U235 fission?

yiuscott
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
My textbook said that only lower energy neutrons (around 1ev) favor Uranium fission while higher energy neutrons don't. Is there an explanation for this. ( i don't think we are required to know it for the course but I'm just interested...)

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I was just looking around on wikipedia and found out that it says that high energy neutrons are easily absorbed by U238. I am guessing the reason that they put the low energy neutrons is to stop the neutrons from being absorbed by the U238... Is this a correct guess? if so why do high energy neutrons get absorbed by the U238 easily while the lower energy neutrons don't?
 
Well the first reason is the pairing force, U238 is a double even nuclei and hence a little bit more bound than U235, and therefore need to get higher energy to pass the activation energy. So U235 can be fissioned by low E neutrons, while U238 don't - it needs more energetically neutrons.

The second reason is that the cross section to react with a neutron generally decreases as a function of its velocity/energy (general for all atomic nuclei, of course - there also exists peaks in that cross section - so called resonant peaks). And the reason for that general feature of the cross section is that the higher the energy, the less time it passes through\near the nuclei, and the less time to react with it (basically speaking).

See for instance the fission chapter in the textbook by Krane.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Back
Top