Why Does Misting Fan Cool Air?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hacillunation
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Work
AI Thread Summary
Misting fans cool air through the process of evaporative cooling, where the evaporation of water droplets absorbs energy from the surrounding air, lowering its temperature. While the energy levels of the water and vapor may be similar, the temperature of the air decreases due to the increase in potential energy of the water molecules as they transition from liquid to vapor. The kinetic energy of the surrounding air molecules decreases as energy is used to separate the water molecules, resulting in cooler air. Although water vapor has higher particle speed, it can still lead to a net decrease in air temperature. This interaction between water and air explains the cooling effect of misting fans.
hacillunation
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
So, as far as I know evaporative cooling is when the top layer of a material (lets say water) evaporates- taking energy with it leaving the rest of the material cooler. Also leaving the air, which transported some heat to it, cooler.

But in a misting fan, the mist evaporates, takes energy from the air, and then- it just remains there.
So the overall energy level of the system should be the same, no? Same entlapy, same entropy.

Then why when this mixture of air and evaporated water droplets blows- even that you suposedly get a system with the same energy level as before, it cools you down?

Thx.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hacillunation said:
So, as far as I know evaporative cooling is when the top layer of a material (lets say water) evaporates- taking energy with it leaving the rest of the material cooler. Also leaving the air, which transported some heat to it, cooler.

But in a misting fan, the mist evaporates, takes energy from the air, and then- it just remains there.
So the overall energy level of the system should be the same, no? Same entlapy, same entropy.

Then why when this mixture of air and evaporated water droplets blows- even that you suposedly get a system with the same energy level as before, it cools you down?

Thx.
The energy liquid water may have the same as the energy of the water vapour but the temperature has decreased. The water mixing with the air results in an increase in potential energy of the water molecules. This potential energy comes at the expense of the kinetic energy of the surrounding air. So the temperature of the surrounding air decreases.

The potential energy of water molecules in vapour comes from the fact that water molecules are polar - in liquid and solid form they stick together and it takes energy to separate them.

AM
 
Thank you for the succint answer.

That raises another question then...
So, youre saying that water vapor is cooler than the water it escapes from?
But when water evaporates, doen't it increase its particle speed?
 
The mist is liquid not vapor. That's why it is visible.

Also when you said "same entropy", the statement is wrong.
 
hacillunation said:
Thank you for the succint answer.

That raises another question then...
So, youre saying that water vapor is cooler than the water it escapes from?
But when water evaporates, doen't it increase its particle speed?
It is a bit complicated because the water molecules in liquid form are stuck together and have vibrational kinetic energy. When they separate into individual molecules (vaporization) they no longer vibrate against each other but have translational kinetic energy. The average translational kinetic energy of those water molecules can be less than the original liquid water but because they are not stuck to other water molecules they stay in vapour form. The energy required to separate the molecules is at the expense of the kinetic energy of the surrounding air molecules. So the temperature of the air decreases as more water is vaporized.

AM
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top