Why Does Misting Fan Cool Air?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hacillunation
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Work
AI Thread Summary
Misting fans cool air through the process of evaporative cooling, where the evaporation of water droplets absorbs energy from the surrounding air, lowering its temperature. While the energy levels of the water and vapor may be similar, the temperature of the air decreases due to the increase in potential energy of the water molecules as they transition from liquid to vapor. The kinetic energy of the surrounding air molecules decreases as energy is used to separate the water molecules, resulting in cooler air. Although water vapor has higher particle speed, it can still lead to a net decrease in air temperature. This interaction between water and air explains the cooling effect of misting fans.
hacillunation
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
So, as far as I know evaporative cooling is when the top layer of a material (lets say water) evaporates- taking energy with it leaving the rest of the material cooler. Also leaving the air, which transported some heat to it, cooler.

But in a misting fan, the mist evaporates, takes energy from the air, and then- it just remains there.
So the overall energy level of the system should be the same, no? Same entlapy, same entropy.

Then why when this mixture of air and evaporated water droplets blows- even that you suposedly get a system with the same energy level as before, it cools you down?

Thx.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hacillunation said:
So, as far as I know evaporative cooling is when the top layer of a material (lets say water) evaporates- taking energy with it leaving the rest of the material cooler. Also leaving the air, which transported some heat to it, cooler.

But in a misting fan, the mist evaporates, takes energy from the air, and then- it just remains there.
So the overall energy level of the system should be the same, no? Same entlapy, same entropy.

Then why when this mixture of air and evaporated water droplets blows- even that you suposedly get a system with the same energy level as before, it cools you down?

Thx.
The energy liquid water may have the same as the energy of the water vapour but the temperature has decreased. The water mixing with the air results in an increase in potential energy of the water molecules. This potential energy comes at the expense of the kinetic energy of the surrounding air. So the temperature of the surrounding air decreases.

The potential energy of water molecules in vapour comes from the fact that water molecules are polar - in liquid and solid form they stick together and it takes energy to separate them.

AM
 
Thank you for the succint answer.

That raises another question then...
So, youre saying that water vapor is cooler than the water it escapes from?
But when water evaporates, doen't it increase its particle speed?
 
The mist is liquid not vapor. That's why it is visible.

Also when you said "same entropy", the statement is wrong.
 
hacillunation said:
Thank you for the succint answer.

That raises another question then...
So, youre saying that water vapor is cooler than the water it escapes from?
But when water evaporates, doen't it increase its particle speed?
It is a bit complicated because the water molecules in liquid form are stuck together and have vibrational kinetic energy. When they separate into individual molecules (vaporization) they no longer vibrate against each other but have translational kinetic energy. The average translational kinetic energy of those water molecules can be less than the original liquid water but because they are not stuck to other water molecules they stay in vapour form. The energy required to separate the molecules is at the expense of the kinetic energy of the surrounding air molecules. So the temperature of the air decreases as more water is vaporized.

AM
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top