Why does my general solution for a double pendulum have three unknowns?

zenterix
Messages
774
Reaction score
84
Homework Statement
This question is about some calculations I saw in a video lecture about coupled oscillators.
Relevant Equations
In particular, there is the derivation of the solutions to the problem of the double pendulum.

It seems to me the derivation ends up with three unknown parameters to be determined by initial conditions. Shouldn't it be four?
For the record, here is the lecture I am speaking of.

Consider a double pendulum.

1722983745368.png


I'm going to skip the setup of the problem and jump to the system of differential equations

$$m\ddot{x}_1=-\frac{3g}{l}x_1+\frac{g}{l}x_2\tag{1}$$

$$m\ddot{x}_2=\frac{g}{l}x_1-\frac{g}{l}x_2\tag{2}$$

where ##\omega_0^2=\frac{g}{l}##.

The lecturer then says that any normal mode solution will have to have the form

$$x_1=A_1\cos{(\omega t+\phi_1)}\tag{3}$$

$$x_2=A_2\cos{(\omega t+\phi_2)}\tag{4}$$

We plug these into the system and we reach

$$A_1(\omega^2-3\omega_0^2)+A_2\omega_0^2=0\tag{5}$$

$$A_1\omega_0^2+A_2(\omega^2-\omega_0^2)=0\tag{6}$$

The only way this has a non-zero solution for ##A_1## and ##A_2## is if the system matrix has a zero determinant.

Given ##\omega_0##, this happens for two positive values of ##\omega##. Let's call them ##\omega_A## and ##\omega_B## (I won't post the actual values because it isn't important for my question I think).

For each of these these angular frequencies, the system represented by (5) and (6) is singular: there is only one equation. We can only determine the ratio ##A_1/A_2=r##.

The normal mode solutions are then

$$x_1=r_1A_2\cos{(\omega_A t+\phi_1)}\tag{s1}$$

$$x_2=A_2\cos{(\omega_A t+\phi_2)}\tag{s1}$$

and

$$x_1=r_2A_2\cos{(\omega_B t+\phi_1)}\tag{s2}$$

$$x_2=A_2\cos{(\omega_B t+\phi_2)}\tag{s2}$$

The general solution seems to be the sum of these solutions.

My question is about the number of unknown parameters to be determined by initial conditions.

As far as I can tell we have ##A_2, \phi_1,## and ##\phi_2##.

Shouldn't there be four?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Okay, so I think the answer to my question is that actually ##A_2## is distinct for each of the normal modes. I noticed this just after posting.

The normal mode solutions are then

$$x_1=r_1A_{2,1}\cos{(\omega_A t+\phi_1)}\tag{s1}$$

$$x_2=A_{2,1}\cos{(\omega_A t+\phi_2)}\tag{s1}$$

and

$$x_1=r_2A_{2,2}\cos{(\omega_B t+\phi_1)}\tag{s2}$$

$$x_2=A_{2,2}\cos{(\omega_B t+\phi_2)}\tag{s2}$$

So the unknown parameters are actually ##A_{2,1}, A_{2,2}, \phi_1,## and ##\phi_2##.
 
zenterix said:
The normal mode solutions are then$$x_1=r_1A_{2,1}\cos{(\omega_A t+\phi_1)}\tag{s1}$$ $$x_2=A_{2,1}\cos{(\omega_A t+\phi_2)}\tag{s1}$$
For a normal mode, the phase constant ##\phi## is the same for ##x_1## and ##x_2##. See your video link at time 37:35. So, for the first normal mode (mode ##A##), let ##\phi_A## be the common phase constant of ##x_1## and ##x_2##. For the second mode (mode ##B##), let ##\phi_B## be the phase constant. Thus, for mode ##A##

$$x_1=r_1A_2\cos{(\omega_A t+\phi_A)}\tag{s1}$$ $$x_2=A_2\cos{(\omega_A t+\phi_A)}\tag{s1}.$$ For mode ##B##, $$x_1=r_1B_2\cos{(\omega_B t+\phi_B)}\tag{s1}$$ $$x_2=B_2\cos{(\omega_B t+\phi_B)}\tag{s1}.$$
What are the four parameters that are determined by the initial conditions?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top