Mathematica Why Does My ParametricPlot3D Look Choppy in Mathematica 6.0?

  • Thread starter Thread starter robert spicuzza
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graphs Mathematica
AI Thread Summary
The user is experiencing choppy visuals when using ParametricPlot3D in Mathematica 6.0 to graph a Fernet-type curve derived from a defined parametric function. Despite attempts to enhance the appearance by adjusting parameters and increasing precision, the output remains rough. The user has experimented with different curves, achieving better results with simpler shapes but still struggles with the Fernet curve. They suspect that maintaining higher precision in calculations is essential for improving both the visual quality and calculation speed. Overall, the discussion revolves around seeking solutions to refine the graph's appearance while optimizing performance in Mathematica.
robert spicuzza
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I have recently been working in Mathematica 6.0 trying to graph various curves using ParametricPlot3D. I have specifically defined:
a1[p_]={(sqrt(25-p^2))*Sin[10*p],(Sqrt(25-p^2))*Cos[10*p],(p)^2};

Graphing this is no problem.

The problem is I am trying to turn this into a Fernet type curve using the standard INT normalized basis vectors one studies in Cal3. ( take the tangent vector, then the normal vector, then the cross product). When I finally end up using the PramametricPlot3D the result although looking correct is pretty rough (very choppy, not clean at all) .

Any thoughts on how to improving the appearance and hopefully calculation speed as I want to ultimately use this in a much larger Mathematica programming context.

I have tried other simplifier Fernet curves and they look ok, examples like a standard doughnut or corkscrew, {Sin, Cos, u }

I assume I probably need to carry greater immediate precision in the various calculations and also need to somehow speed up the calculations. I’ve tried some increased precision commands, but they did not help the graph.

Any thought would be helpful.
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
made the graph a little better

After calculating the normal and bi normal vector I adjusted the final parameters:
I used 0.1v with v from 0 to 500

This made the curve look a little crisper, but it still has its problems.

The final fernet equation using the normal and bi-normal vectors
w[p_, v_] := a1[p] + 1.0 Sin[.10 v]*an[p] + 1.0 Cos[.10 v]*ab[p];
pp = ParametricPlot3D[w[p, v], {p, 0, 10}, {v, 0, 500*Pi},
PlotRange -> {{-8, 8}, {-8, 8}, {0, 30}}]

Again I think the precision issue is really the problem.
Again any thoughts!

Bob
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
52
Views
12K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Back
Top