Why Does n^0=1? Understanding the Exponent Rule in Math

  • Thread starter Thread starter Universe_Man
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explains why n^0 equals 1 by referencing the exponent rule that states x^a * x^b = x^(a+b). To maintain this rule for cases where a or b is zero, x^0 must be defined as 1, since x^0 * x^a = x^a. This definition ensures consistency across all integer and non-integer powers. Additionally, it highlights that defining n^0 as 1 allows for the validity of exponent rules even with negative powers. Thus, the mathematical community agrees that defining a^0 as 1 is essential for maintaining the integrity of exponentiation.
Universe_Man
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
I always learned this in math, but never really questioned it.

why does n^0=1
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Universe_Man said:
I always learned this in math, but never really questioned it.

why does n^0=1
Alright, first you know x=x^1 and x^1x^1=x^{1+1}=x^2, right? And in general, x^ax^b=x^{a+b} when a and b are greater than or equal to one. So why not define x^0 so that this is true even if a or b is zero? If this is the case then
x^0x^a=x^{a+0}=x^a
We have x0xa=xa, so as long as x is not zero we can divide by xa to come out with x^0=1.

More generally, powers are defined so that x^ax^b=x^{a+b} is true even when a and b are not integers and even when they are not real.
 
Last edited:
A simple proof:

Because (n^a)*(n^b) = n^{a+b},
it can be said that n^0 is equivalent to n^1 * n^{-1}.
n * (1/n) = 1,
therefore, n^0 = 1
 
Last edited:
OH OH ok I get it, thanks a lot guys.
 
In other words, if we want aman= an+m to be true for 0 as well as positive integer value of m and n, we must define a0= 1.
It is also true that if we want aman= an+m to be true for negative integer powers, then we must have ana-n= a0= 1. In other words, we must define a^{-n}= \frac{1}{n}.

To see how we must define a^{\frac{1}{n}}, look at the law
(an)m= amn.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
581
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Back
Top