Why Does Particle Emission Follow a Poisson Distro?

  • Thread starter Thread starter marc.morcos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Poisson
marc.morcos
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Why does particle emission follow a poisson?

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
marc.morcos said:
Why does particle emission follow a poisson?

Thanks in advance

This is a vague question.

What particle? And what property exactly that follows a poisson distribution? I can show you the energy spectrum of beta decay that follows nowhere near a poisson distribution.

If you wish to get some degree of a rational response, you should make some effort into presenting a clear question.

Zz.
 
He probably means that particle emission follows a Poisson process.

If an event has a constant probability per unit time of occurring (i.e., the probability of X happening in the next 10 seconds is always a constant \lambda), then that event can be modeled as a Poisson process. Google it to find a derivation.
 
thanks a lot, sorry about the lack of detail, i was trying to type it before my laptop battery died... what i meant was what ben said. i was looking for the derivation in specific.
 
marc.morcos said:
thanks a lot, sorry about the lack of detail, i was trying to type it before my laptop battery died... what i meant was what ben said. i was looking for the derivation in specific.


The possion distribution is derived from the binomial distribution in with two limits. i. the probablity for one event goes to zero and ii. the number of trials goes to infinty. I don't remember it 100%, so better look it up on google or in a reference in introductory statistics. And that is also why one can say (as Ben Niehoff) that the probablity is constant \lambda
and so on.

The reason for WHY radioactive decay follow poisson is that is a probibalistic process, and that you have a large sample.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top