Why Does Resistance Decrease in Parallel Circuits?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Lim Y K
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Parallel Series
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of resistance in parallel circuits, specifically addressing why the effective resistance decreases when components such as light bulbs are arranged in parallel. Participants explore the implications of circuit configuration on resistance, current flow, and voltage distribution.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that while more wire is involved in a parallel circuit, the multiple paths available do not necessarily increase the overall resistance.
  • Another participant explains that lengthening a wire increases resistance, but increasing the diameter decreases it, suggesting that parallel configurations provide multiple paths that reduce effective resistance.
  • Several participants inquire about why the total resistance in a parallel circuit is less than any individual resistance, prompting discussions about voltage and current distribution across the paths.
  • One participant emphasizes the importance of deriving the formula for effective resistance to understand the underlying principles, referencing Ohm's law.
  • A metaphor involving water pipes is introduced to help conceptualize the flow of current in parallel circuits, questioning whether multiple pipes would carry more or less water than a single pipe.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding the relationship between resistance and circuit configuration. While there is some agreement on the mechanics of current flow and voltage in parallel circuits, the discussion remains unresolved with multiple perspectives on the implications of these concepts.

Contextual Notes

Some participants rely on specific assumptions about voltage and current distribution that may not be universally applicable. The discussion also highlights the need for a deeper exploration of the mathematical derivation of effective resistance in parallel circuits.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and enthusiasts of electrical engineering, physics, and anyone interested in understanding circuit behavior, particularly in relation to resistance and current flow in parallel configurations.

Lim Y K
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Effective resistance in parallel is 1/r1+1/r2+1/r3. However, i don't get why there is lesser resistance when the bulbs are arranged in parallel. I thought arranging a circuit in parallel requires more wire(conductors) , which will increase the resistivity. can someone explain to me please? thank you in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's more wire involved, but the various paths through the network don't have to travel through all of it so the resistance doesn't have to higher. If you work out the ##1/R_1+1/R_2## formula for yourself you'll see how this works:
- What is the current through R1?
- What is the current through R2?
- What is the total current through the network, and what does that tell you about the effective resistance?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Lim Y K said:
I thought arranging a circuit in parallel requires more wire(conductors) , which will increase the resistivity. can someone explain to me please?

Lengthening a single wire increases total resistance, but making the wire a larger diameter decreases it. By putting the light bulbs in parallel you are kind of doing the latter. As Nugatory said, there are multiple path choices, so any particular charge will only flow through one path and will only encounter resistance equal to one path.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lim Y K
Drakkith said:
Lengthening a single wire increases total resistance, but making the wire a larger diameter decreases it. By putting the light bulbs in parallel you are kind of doing the latter. As Nugatory said, there are multiple path choices, so any particular charge will only flow through one path and will only encounter resistance equal to one path.

I see. Then may I know why the total resistance in a parallel circuit is smaller than any of the individual resistance?
 
Lim Y K said:
I see. Then may I know why the total resistance in a parallel circuit is smaller than any of the individual resistance?

The voltage applied to each path is the same, and the current through each path is just the voltage divided by the resistance of that path. But when the paths come together the current from each is summed together. So the 'effective' resistance is less than the resistance of anyone path. I suggest doing what Nugatory suggested in post #2.
 
Lim Y K said:
I see. Then may I know why the total resistance in a parallel circuit is smaller than any of the individual resistance?

As I said above, you should be able to derive the formula for yourself - when you do, you'll see why it makes sense. Start with ##V=IR##; a trivial rearrangement gives you ##R=V/I## which tells you what the effective resistance is if you know the voltage and the current through the network. ##I## is the sum of the currents through each path, so as you add paths while holding the voltage constant ##I## increases and ##R## decreases.

Don't take my word for it though - work it out for yourself so you know where the formula came from. The basic idea is in my post #2 above.
 
To help you conceptualize it, just think of water pipes connected to a water tower or something. Will two pipes in parallel carry more or less water than one pipe? What about a pipe twice as long (but dropping the same vertical distance)?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K