Why does someone with normal vision not need glasses?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Xelb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Optics
AI Thread Summary
Individuals with normal vision do not require glasses because their eyes are properly shaped, allowing light to focus directly on the retina without additional lenses. Far-sighted individuals need glasses with a positive focal length to help converge light rays, enabling them to see nearby objects clearly. Conversely, near-sighted individuals require glasses with a negative focal length to diverge light rays, allowing them to focus on distant objects. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the basic principles of optics to grasp these concepts. Overall, clarity on these topics is essential for those studying vision and corrective lenses.
Xelb
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


These are more-so explanation based and there is no math involved.

1) How come someone with "normal vision" does not require glasses?
2) Why does a far sighted person require glasses with a positive focal length?
3) Why does a near sighted person require glasses with a negative focal length?

It's bad enough that we have not covered the chapters dealing with optics in lecture yet, so some brief clarification would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Xelb said:

Homework Statement


These are more-so explanation based and there is no math involved.

1) How come someone with "normal vision" does not require glasses?
2) Why does a far sighted person require glasses with a positive focal length?
3) Why does a near sighted person require glasses with a negative focal length?

It's bad enough that we have not covered the chapters dealing with optics in lecture yet, so some brief clarification would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!

Welcome to the PF.

We require that you show some effort in answering these schoolwork questions before we can offer much tutorial help. That means that if you have not covered this in your coursework yet, you should use the web or your textbook to do some reading about the basics involved. Then you should be able to take at least a afirst cut at answering the questions, and we can check your answers for you.

I did a Google search on Corrective Lenses Conceptual Questions, and this was one of the first hits (Google suggested the last two words of the search):

http://www.angelfire.com/scifi2/eyeglass/

That should help you out...
 
So I was able to figure out the answers to questions 2 and 3.

For 1, however, I'm still not sure about it...but here's my guess:

Because a normal eye is neither elongated nor smaller, this means that neither a converging or diverging lens is needed in order to focus nearby objects on the retinal surface. On a normal eye, the image is produced normally on the retina because the refraction process begins when light reaches the eye.
 
Xelb said:
So I was able to figure out the answers to questions 2 and 3.

For 1, however, I'm still not sure about it...but here's my guess:

Because a normal eye is neither elongated nor smaller, this means that neither a converging or diverging lens is needed in order to focus nearby objects on the retinal surface. On a normal eye, the image is produced normally on the retina because the refraction process begins when light reaches the eye.

Sounds reasonable to me. :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top