Why Does Swiping a Card in a Plastic Bag Help It Read at the Checkout?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the phenomenon of swiping a card in a plastic bag at checkout and its perceived effectiveness in improving card reading by card readers. Participants explore potential explanations for this occurrence, including the role of magnetic fields and contamination of card readers.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that the plastic bag may change the relative permittivity of the material, potentially affecting how the magnetic field interacts with the card reader.
  • Another participant proposes that the plastic acts as a "head cleaner," removing dirt and debris from the card reader, which could interfere with the reading process.
  • A later reply challenges the assumption that the plastic bag is the definitive cause of the improved reading, using an analogy to illustrate that correlation does not imply causation.
  • One participant emphasizes that a plausible explanation has been provided, but acknowledges uncertainty about whether it is the correct answer.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the effectiveness of the plastic bag, with some supporting the idea that it improves card reading through cleaning or dielectric effects, while others question the validity of this explanation and highlight the need for caution in drawing conclusions.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the potential for contamination of card readers as a factor in card reading failures, but the discussion remains open-ended regarding the specific mechanisms at play.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in the technical aspects of card reading technology, as well as those curious about practical solutions to common checkout issues.

cragar
Messages
2,546
Reaction score
3
Sometimes when i swipe my card at walmart it doesn't read it , And the guy was like let's put it a plastic bag and then try it, and it works and I've heard a couple of other people doing this.
So when i slide my card the magnetic strip induces a voltage and reads the card. So why does putting it in a plastic bag work. Does this change the relative permittivity of the material.
Does the bag just add more di-electric material so the magnetic field interacts with the detector in the card reader like it should and not too strongly.
Any input will be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is one of those things that I would have considered an "urban myth" if I had not experienced it myself. The cashier's explanation makes more sense than most that I've heard (and not just because she's a friend of mine). The readers collect crud from dirty cards when they're swiped. When enough has accumulated, it interferes with the reading process. The plastic (or cellophane tape, or whatever) added to the card acts as a "head cleaner" like you use in a VCR or DVD player. It scrapes the crap off of the heads prior to the mag stripe passing, and so allows reading. Further evidence of that is that once it has been done, subsequent purchasers don't have a problem.
As a side-note to that, my card would never work at the ATM terminal in one of my local gas stations. The cashier there said that it hardly ever worked, because it was constantly contaminated with petroleum fumes.
 
i see thanks for the response .
 
Different analogy:

At 5:00AM I did a dance to make the sun rise. It didn't work. I sat down, and scratched my head and then tried it again at 6:30AM while wearing a headband, and, lo and behold, the sun rose. I therefore conclude that I was right to don a headband, and headbands make the sun rise. The popular use of headbands throughout the world prove my thesis.

Stated differently: the change you deliberately made is not necessarily the complete sum of changes made, therefore you can't assume the bag worked. The fact you can't think of a means by which it could work is probably indicative.
 
MagnetDave said:
The fact you can't think of a means by which it could work is probably indicative.

Have you been paying attention? I just outlined a very plausible means by which it could work. I don't know for sure that it's the correct answer, but certainly consider it possible.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 194 ·
7
Replies
194
Views
23K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
14K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K