Why Does the Binomial Theorem Summation Not Equal 2n When n Varies?

Puzzedd
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Using summation((\stackrel{n}{k})xkyn-k) = (x+y)n, I let x = y = 1. This should then result in summation((\stackrel{n}{k})*1*1) = (1 + 1)n = 2n.

Expanding the summation, I get

(\stackrel{n}{0}) + (\stackrel{n}{1}) + ... +(\stackrel{n}{n}) = 2n.

Solving this results in

\frac{n!}{0!(n-0)!} + \frac{n!}{1!(n-1)!} + \frac{n!}{2!(n-2)!} + ... + \frac{n!}{(n-1)!(n-(n-1))!} + \frac{n!}{n!(n-n)!} = 2n

1 + n + \frac{n(n-1)}{2!} + \frac{n(n-1)(n-2)}{3!} + ... + n + 1 = 2n

2 + 2n + n(n-1) + \frac{n(n-1)(n-2)}{3} + ... = 2n

The issue I am having is that when I plug values of n into the left side I do not get the same answer with the right side.

n = 0 results in 2 + 2(0) + ... = 2, not 20
n = 1 results in 2 + 2(1) + 1(1-1) + ... = 4, not 21
n = 2 results in 2 + 2(2) + 2(2-1) + \frac{2(2-1)(2-2)}{3} + ... = 8, not 22
n = 3 results in 2 + 2(3) + 3(3-1) + \frac{3(3-1)(3-2)}{3} + ... = 16, not 23

This seems as if (\stackrel{n}{0}) + (\stackrel{n}{1}) + ... +(\stackrel{n}{n}) = 2n should really be

(\stackrel{n}{0}) + (\stackrel{n}{1}) + ... +(\stackrel{n}{n}) = 2n+1

Can anyone tell me why solving this summation is not consistent with the binomial theorem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your problem lays in the fact that {n\choose k}={n\choose n-k}. While manipulating the expanded factorial form of the series you combined these coefficients, effectively doubling the terms for each choice of n. Whereas for n=0 there should be exactly one term, n\choose 0, you instead have two terms {n\choose 0}+{n\choose n}.
(Which is equal to 2{0\choose 0}).
 
JThompson is right.

If you wish to combind \binom{n}{k} and \binom{n}{n-k} to get \binom{n}{k}+\binom{n}{n-k}=2\binom{n}{k}, you need to stop in the middle, or you will double the whole thing and get 2·2n=2n+1.

If n is odd, you get:
2\binom{n}{0}+2\binom{n}{1}+\ldots+2\binom{n}{\frac{n-1}{2}}=2^n
So the last term should be when k = (n-1)/2. If n=1, the last term should be when k=0, which means there'll only be one term: 2\binom{1}{0}=2
If n=3, you get: 2\binom{3}{0}+2\binom{3}{1}=8 etc.

If n is even, you get:
2\binom{n}{0}+2\binom{n}{1}+...+2\binom{n}{\frac{n}{2}-1}+\binom{n}{\frac{n}{2}}=2^n
So the last term should not be multiplied by 2. That is when k = n/2. If n=0, k will also be 0 in the last term. Since it's the last term, it should not be multiplied by 2.
Exapmles where n is even:
n=0: \binom{0}{0}=1
n=2: 2\binom{2}{0}+\binom{2}{1}=4
n=4: 2\binom{4}{0}+2\binom{4}{1}+\binom{4}{2}=16

So if you wish to combind 2 terms to get fewer terms, remember to stop in the middle, and if n is even, don't multiply the last term by 2.
If you want, you could also just keep all the terms and not multiply any of them by 2.
 
Thanks! I spent an hour thinking about it last night and couldn't see what I was doing wrong.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top