Why does the CMOS inverter operate in triode mode in static operation?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the operation of a CMOS inverter in static conditions, specifically why the PMOS transistor operates in triode mode rather than saturation mode when the input voltage is set to zero. The analysis reveals that with the NMOS turned off and the PMOS on, the output voltage (V_o) must equal V_dd due to the lack of load, leading to the condition where V_sd is less than V_ov. This results in the PMOS being in triode mode, as the output voltage cannot exceed the threshold voltage for a logic high. The conclusion emphasizes that without a load, the PMOS cannot enter saturation, reinforcing the necessity for triode operation in this scenario. Overall, the circuit's behavior is dictated by the static conditions and the absence of current flow through the NMOS.
iiJDSii
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I have a question about how to analyze the CMOS inverter (this circuit: http://www.cs.umass.edu/~weems/CmpSci635A/Lecture2/image10.gif ). Just to clarify, the input voltage is connected to both gates, and the PMOS on top has its source connected to Vdd. The NMOS on the bottom has its source connected to GND. The drains of both FETs are connected, and it is at this node which we take our output to be.

Assume for now the transistors are matched such that V_tn = |V_tp| = V_t (equal threshold voltages), and k_n*(W/L)n = k_p*(W/L)p. Also say Vdd is 5v. In this example I'll be considering static operation (V_i is set to some value for all time).

So here's me trying to reason out what may happen. I know the answer, I just don't see why I don't exactly get there. Start with V_i = 0 (input voltage). This turns off the NMOS as V_gs = 0, no current flows in this transistor. Now we for the PMOS we know V_sg = Vdd > V_t so we can have either triode or saturation mode. What I can't properly reason through is why we must have triode mode in static operation. Comparing V_sd to V_ov I can see either case being possible.

V_sd = Vdd - V_o

V_ov = V_sg - V_t = Vdd - V_i - V_t = Vdd - V_t (since V_i = 0)

All I really know here is that Vdd is 5v, and V_t is, say, 1v. As I said before, I know the answer is supposed to be that the PMOS takes on triode mode. But I'm having trouble seeing what is wrong with saturation mode. Assuming V_sd > V_ov, this condition for saturation can still be valid. Working through the inequality, I get:

V_o < V_t (= 1v say.)

But clearly this does not give a logic high. Assuming triode mode (V_sd < V_ov) gives me the condition V_o > V_t, and my textbook furthermore replaces the PMOS with a small resistor with the value V_sd/I_d (which can be described purely in terms of device parameters, if V_sd is assumed so small that V_sd^2 can be neglected). Then the circuit just becomes Vdd connected to a resistor connected to the output node V_o. So then they conclude V_o = Vdd.

Any insights into why the circuit must operate in triode as opposed to saturation? Thanks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
As you stated the P is turned on but because it is in DC, and it has no load, then Vs=Vd=Vdd as Id=0A. Therefore Vov=Vsg-Vt=(5-0)-1 > Vsd=0, thus the P is in triode.
 
thanks for the reply es1.

So because the PMOS is on but not connected to any load we must have V_o = Vdd. I guess for the case of a parasitic capacitance from V_o to ground this doesn't affect the DC analysis either, thus keeping it in triode mode.

I think I get it, thanks again.
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top