Why Does the Equation x/2 = 3/y Represent a Hyperbola?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dynamic998
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Short
dynamic998
x/2 = 3/y. Can anyone explain why this is an hyperbola?

find the third term of the expansion (2x-y)to the third power.
I know u have to do the things with the combinations but all i get is 20xy² but the answer is 6xy². Can anyone help?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
find the third term of the expansion (2x-y)to the third power.
I know u have to do the things with the combinations but all i get is 20xy?but the answer is 6xy? Can anyone help?

I think you mean to find the 3rd term in descending powers of x


Method 1:
(2x-y)3 = (Summation r from 0 to 3) C3r (2x)r (-y)3-r

So the third term
=C32(2x)(-y)2
=6xy2

Method 2:
You can expand (2x-y)3 directly.
 
To see that your first problem

x/2 = 3/y is a hyperbola, do a coordinate transform to rotate the coordinate axis by π/2 radians.

you will find that (let u & v be the new axis)

u=xcosθ + ysinθ
v=-xsinθ + ycosθ

Let θ = π/2

solve for x & y

x = (v-u)/sqrt(2) y=(v+u)/sqrt(2)

substituting this back into the origianal relationship gives

(v-u)(v+u)/2 =6

or

v*v - u*u = 12

This is the standard form for a hyperbola.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top