Why does the expansion of space in a uniform universe only push outward?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Farahday
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expansion
AI Thread Summary
In a uniform universe characterized by isotropy and homogeneity, the expansion of space is directed outward rather than inward, despite the potential for both directions to maintain symmetry. This outward expansion does not inherently lead to galaxies being pushed together; instead, it reflects the nature of cosmic expansion. The discussion emphasizes that isotropy and homogeneity do not dictate the direction of expansion, which could theoretically occur in either direction. The key takeaway is that uniform expansion preserves the symmetry of the universe, regardless of whether it is expanding or contracting. Thus, the outward push of space is a distinct characteristic of cosmic expansion.
Farahday
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
In an isotrophic and homogeneous cosmos, why would the expansion of space be specifically be vectored outward. Should it not also push galaxies together?
 
Space news on Phys.org
The outward nature of the expansion is (in this case) unrelated to the isotropy and homogeneity of the universe. It could be either inward or outward, and still both isotropic and homogenous.

Remember that isotropic means the same in all directions (i.e. no matter which direction you look, things look the same); and homogenous means the same in all places (i.e. no matter where you go, things look the same). As long as space was uniformly expanding or contracting, it would preserve the same symmetry.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Why was the Hubble constant assumed to be decreasing and slowing down (decelerating) the expansion rate of the Universe, while at the same time Dark Energy is presumably accelerating the expansion? And to thicken the plot. recent news from NASA indicates that the Hubble constant is now increasing. Can you clarify this enigma? Also., if the Hubble constant eventually decreases, why is there a lower limit to its value?
Back
Top