Why Does the Growth-Rate of a Titration Curve Vary?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the growth rate of pH during a titration curve, particularly when titrating a strong acid with a strong base. Initially, the growth rate of pH is small due to the presence of un-protonated acid molecules that act as a buffer, resisting changes in pH. As more titrant is added, the volume of the solution increases while the concentration of hydrogen ions decreases, leading to a non-linear relationship. This results in a more significant pH change as the titration approaches the equivalence point. The calculations provided illustrate how small additions of titrant can lead to larger changes in pH as the titration progresses, especially near the neutralization point. The curve's shape is influenced by the dilution effect and the decreasing concentration of hydrogen ions, which explains why the growth rate is not constant throughout the titration process.
Nikitin
Messages
734
Reaction score
27
They say it's possible to find the growth-rate ie the second derivative of a titration curve on wikipedia. I am interested in finding & deriving such a formula, because I need to know why the growth-rate is so small in the beginning of the titration but it gets so much bigger as you add larger volumes of the titrant.. Shouldn't it be the opposite, if it isn't linear?

I don't get it, if a strong acid is titrated gradually by a strong base, shouldn't the pH growth-rate until the equivalence point be constant? Ie the function should be linear until the equivalence point?

If I would guess the reason, would it be because the water is kind of "resistant" to titration? Let's take the picture below as an example: there are kind of "reserves" of un-protolyzed acids which act as a buffer vs the titrating base?[PLAIN]http://www.files.chem.vt.edu/chem-ed/titration/graphics/titration-strong-acid-35ml.gif
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Nikitin said:
They say it's possible to find the growth-rate ie the second derivative of a titration curve on wikipedia. I am interested in finding & deriving such a formula, because I need to know why the growth-rate is so small in the beginning of the titration but it gets so much bigger as you add larger volumes of the titrant.. Shouldn't it be the opposite, if it isn't linear?

I don't get it, if a strong acid is titrated gradually by a strong base, shouldn't the pH growth-rate until the equivalence point be constant? Ie the function should be linear until the equivalence point?

If I would guess the reason, would it be because the water is kind of "resistant" to titration? Let's take the picture below as an example: there are kind of "reserves" of un-protolyzed acids which act as a buffer vs the titrating base?


[PLAIN]http://www.files.chem.vt.edu/chem-ed/titration/graphics/titration-strong-acid-35ml.gif[/QUOTE]

The curve represents the pH and in turn the pH is given by the -log[H+]

So you would expect the curve to follow a logarithmic curve as the hydrogen ion concentration falls by an even amount.

BUT the hydrogen ion concentration does not fall by an even amount as the volume of the mixture is constantly increasing while the molar amount of hydrogen is constantly decreasing.

The result of the three factors above is the complex curve shown. The best thing to do is calculate a few examples:

For the addition of NaOH (0.1M) to 25 ml HCl (0.1M)

Initially there is only 0.1M HCl so the pH = 1

Add 1ml of NaOH
-----------------

Moles of NaOH added = 0.001 x 0.1 = 0.0001
Moles of Hydrogen ions used up = 0.0001
Moles of H+ remaining = (0.025 x 0.1) - 0.0001 = 0.0024
New volume = 0.026 ml
New [H+] = 0.0024/0.026 = 0.0923
pH = 1.035

So, addition of 1 ml increases the pH by only 0.035 units

Add another 9 ml NaOH (total 10 ml)
----------------------------------

Moles of NaOH added = 0.01 x 0.1 = 0.001
Moles of Hydrogen ions used up = 0.001
Moles of H+ remaining = (0.025 x 0.1) - 0.001 = 0.0015
New volume = 0.035 ml
New [H+] = 0.0015/0.035 = 0.0429
pH = 1.37

So, addition of 10 ml total NaOH increases the pH by only 0.37 units

Add another 10 ml NaOH (total 20 ml)
----------------------------------

Moles of NaOH added = 0.02 x 0.1 = 0.002
Moles of Hydrogen ions used up = 0.002
Moles of H+ remaining = (0.025 x 0.1) - 0.002 = 0.0005
New volume = 0.045 ml
New [H+] = 0.0005/0.045 = 0.0111
pH = 1.95

So, addition of 20 ml total NaOH increases the pH by only 0.95 units

Add another 4 ml NaOH (total 24 ml)
----------------------------------

Moles of NaOH added = 0.024 x 0.1 = 0.0024
Moles of Hydrogen ions used up = 0.0024
Moles of H+ remaining = (0.025 x 0.1) - 0.0024 = 0.0001
New volume = 0.049 ml
New [H+] = 0.0001/0.049 = 0.00204
pH = 2.69

So, addition of 24 ml total NaOH increases the pH by only 1.69 units

But notice that the last 4 ml increased the pH by more than the prevous 10 ml

Add another 0.9 ml NaOH (total 24.9 ml)
----------------------------------

Moles of NaOH added = 0.0249 x 0.1 = 0.00249
Moles of Hydrogen ions used up = 0.00249
Moles of H+ remaining = (0.025 x 0.1) - 0.00249 = 0.00001
New volume = 0.0499 ml
New [H+] = 0.00001/0.0499 = 0.0002
pH = 3.70

So, addition of 24.9 ml total NaOH increases the pH by 2.7 units

But, the last 0.9ml changed the pH by over 2 pH units.

Now at neutralisation the pH is 7 so an addition of a further 0.1ml is going to change the pH from 3.7 to 7.0.


After the neutralisation point the pH is calculated by finding the excess [OH-] and using kw to get pH.

The result is that the curve is almost symmetrical, but not quite so as the volume keeps increasing.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
thanks, I get it now =)
 
Awesome, thanks so much for this explanation. I've been looking for a good explanation of the shape of a titration curve forever.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!

Similar threads

Back
Top