Why does the range of an inter. vary inv. w/ the mass of its mediator?

  • Thread starter MWBratton
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Mass Range
In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of long-range versus short-range interactions in particle physics. It explains that for a force to have a long range, the intermediate particle must be massless, while a massive intermediate particle will result in a short-range force. The strong force is an exception to this rule due to confinement, where the field lines constantly branch out and produce a powerful force within a distance of 1 femtometer. However, there is no mathematical proof of confinement and it is currently observed through numerical simulations.
  • #1
MWBratton
11
0
Greetings PF! This is my first post...

I keep reading over and over again either "... so and so mediator is massive. Therefore, its interaction is of finite range" or the converse or "... mediator is massless... its interaction is of infinite range..."

Makes sense intuitively (inertia?) However, I am wondering if the true "proof" could be actually somewhat subtle in some way, especially since, apparently, it is impossible to have long range gluon fields even though the gluon is massless

(Follows from asserting that every physical particle is "colorless," so no long range gluon fields are generated to begin with!)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
If you have an electric charge, you can imagine field lines radiating out from it in every direction. The fields lines never end, so if you draw a sphere of radius R around the charge, the same number of field lines pass through the sphere no matter what R is. The surface area o the sphere is ##\pi R^2##, so the number of field lines per unit area, which is proportional to the field strength, falls off as ##1/R^2##. That's why the electric field and other "long-range" forces fall off like ##1/R^2##.

Now, it turns out that if the intermediate particle has a mass, then one thing changes: Mathematically we now have to solve the differential equation

##(\nabla^2 + m^2)\phi = 0##

(m is the mass of the intermediate particle) instead of the equation we had for ##m = 0##:

##\nabla^2 \phi = 0##.

Intuitively, the difference between these equations is that in solutions to the massive equation, the field lines are no longer never-ending but tend to terminate after a characteristic distance ##1/m##. (Some make it farther, and some not as far, but the typical length of a field line is now ##1/m##). Again, the field strength is proportional to the density of field lines, so this picture tells us that the field strength is only appreciable within a distance of order ##1/m##.

You correctly note that the situation with the strong force is more subtle than this picture suggests. The strong force has a finite range but massless intermediate particles. This is possible due to confinement. In fact there is no mathematical proof of confinement, but we can for example observe it in numerical simulations of the strong force (or in absence of a long-range strong force!).

Maybe a way to imagine what happens with the strong force is that field lines sprout new field lines after a characteristic distance of about 1 femtometer, and these new field lines in turn sprout new field lines, and so on. These endlessly branching field lines produce an extremely powerful force that pulls in an opposite color charge to cancel the color charge that is the source of the field lines. The opposite color charge gets pulled into a distance of about 1 femtometer, and if you look at the system from a larger distance than this the the fields of the two opposite color charges cancel and so there is not much field beyond a distance of 1 femtometer. But by now this is a crude analogy to a complicated quantum mechanical process.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
Cool, thanks! Wow, fast response time
 

1. Why is the range of an interaction inversely proportional to the mass of its mediator?

The range of an interaction is determined by the mass of its mediator because the mediator is responsible for carrying the force between particles. The heavier the mediator particle, the shorter its range will be. This is because heavier particles have a shorter lifetime and therefore can only travel a shorter distance before decaying.

2. How does the mass of the mediator affect the strength of the interaction?

The mass of the mediator also affects the strength of the interaction. Generally, the heavier the mediator particle, the stronger the interaction will be. This is because heavier particles have a higher energy and can transfer more force between particles.

3. Are there any exceptions to the inverse relationship between range and mediator mass?

While the inverse relationship between range and mediator mass generally holds true, there are some exceptions. For example, the strong nuclear force, which holds particles together in the nucleus, has a short range despite having a very heavy mediator particle (the gluon). This is because the gluon has a property called "color charge" that allows it to self-interact, making its range much shorter than expected based on its mass alone.

4. Can the range of an interaction be increased by changing the mass of the mediator?

Yes, the range of an interaction can be increased by changing the mass of the mediator. This can be done by either changing the mass of the existing mediator particle or by introducing a new mediator particle with a different mass. However, changing the mass of the mediator can also affect the strength of the interaction, so it must be carefully considered.

5. How does the range of an interaction affect the behavior of particles?

The range of an interaction can greatly affect the behavior of particles. If the range is short, particles will only interact with those in close proximity to them. This can result in clumping or repulsion between particles. On the other hand, if the range is long, particles can interact with those that are far away, leading to more uniform behavior and potential for long-distance forces.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
3
Replies
87
Views
5K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
3
Replies
75
Views
7K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
12
Views
2K
Back
Top