Why Does the Simultaneity Equation Use Gamma Squared?

  • Thread starter Thread starter skynelson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Simultaneity
skynelson
Messages
57
Reaction score
4
I have poured over my old college textbook (Mould) in its description of simultaneity. I came across one sticking point that I don't understand.

The proper equation to describe the relative time between two different points is:

Eqn 1) t' = gamma (t - Lv/c^2)

This equation makes sense to me because I thought I understood simultaneity (the offset factor of Lv/c^2) as well as time dilation (the factor of gamma when changing into the moving/primed frame).

However, the book then inserts another factor of gamma (ostensibly from the t'). Didn't we already account for time dilation with the first gamma?

I know the book is right, since the following reduces properly to an identity:
t/gamma = gamma (t - Lv/c^2)

I just don't understand the logic/physics of it. Yes, of course t' = t/gamma, but we already included that gamma in the right half of equation 1, right?

Why do we have gamma^2? What does that MEAN?
I've pummeled my brain for 6 months on this issue ;-) I think it's time to ask.
Thanks!
Sky
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, of course t' = t/gamma
No, that is a derived result and only valid for L=vt, i.e. at the position of a moving clock. You should write x instead of L to make clear that we're talking about a space coordinate here.
Eq. 1) is the one and only equation to use (of course in combination with x'=gamma(x-vt/c²)), not t'=t/gamma.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...

Similar threads

Back
Top