Why does the speed of the water wave decreases as depth decreases?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The speed of water waves decreases as they approach shallower regions due to energy loss from friction between the water and the seabed, which affects wave height and energy. The transition from orbital to elliptical motion in waves also contributes to this phenomenon, as it alters the wave dynamics. Additionally, opposing currents can significantly impact wave heights and behaviors, particularly during shoaling. Understanding these interactions is crucial for comprehending wave behavior in varying depths.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave dynamics and behavior
  • Familiarity with the concepts of wave shoaling and refraction
  • Knowledge of fluid viscosity and its effects on wave motion
  • Basic principles of wave frequency and amplitude relationships
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "wave shoaling" and its impact on wave speed and height
  • Explore the effects of "opposing currents" on wave dynamics
  • Study the relationship between "wave frequency" and "amplitude" in shallow water
  • Investigate the role of "viscosity" in wave energy dissipation
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, oceanographers, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of water waves and their behavior in varying depths.

tlfx1996
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Why does the speed of the water wave decreases when the water wave approaches the shallower region? Is it because of the frictional force between the water molecules and the seabed? I have searched the net but i didn't get any clear answer to this questions. Please explain in details of the phenomenon without solely based on the formula, thx.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. The friction between the water and the sea bed robs the wave of energy so that it cannot raise up as high.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
but I still couldn't get a clue how does the change from the orbital movement to the elliptical movement will causes the speed to slow down.
 
That's a complex phenomena..as is evidenced by continued failures to prevent erosion...

but there are some good insights here:

http://web.utk.edu/~cnattras/Physics221Spring2013/modules/m11/Water_waves.htm

More here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_waves#Wave_shoaling_and_refraction

I find this second article strange in that they neglect to mention the effects of opposing currents in the very first section but do properly attribute effects of currents in 'shoaling'. I can tell you from long personal experience that opposing current in shoal AND deep water significantly effects wave heights. In fact, current alone usually causes waves to form.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Viscosity (essentially friction) would certainly play a part. The other issue that immediately comes to mind is that as waves come to shore and grow, they become nonlinear and end up Rollin over and creatin whitecaps. These will dissipate a fair amount of energy.
 
I don't know much about waves, but looking at this GIF from Wikipedia:

220px-Propagation_du_tsunami_en_profondeur_variable.gif


Might it have to do with the fact the wave has to keep the same frequency? I don't know if that's true under certain circumstances. If so, then looking at the GIF it kind of makes sense that the amplitude would rise due to the shallow water. The rise in amplitude would shorten the wavelength, and in order to keep the same frequency, the speed has to slow down.

Don't know if any of what I wrote is true or makes sense...

Edit: Following the Wikipedia article, I reached another article on "wave shoaling". I just skimmed over it, but it seems that the answer would lie somewhere in that term.

I suspect friction is not the prime driver for the reduction in speed...
 

Attachments

  • 220px-Propagation_du_tsunami_en_profondeur_variable.gif
    220px-Propagation_du_tsunami_en_profondeur_variable.gif
    11.9 KB · Views: 695
  • 220px-Propagation_du_tsunami_en_profondeur_variable.gif
    220px-Propagation_du_tsunami_en_profondeur_variable.gif
    11.9 KB · Views: 699
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
16K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
5K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K