Why does the stick in a moving frame shrink vertically?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the effects of relativity on objects in different inertial frames, particularly focusing on a freely falling elevator and the concept of tidal forces. It highlights that while two particles in a small distance within the elevator remain unaffected, larger distances can reveal external gravitational influences due to tidal forces. The query specifically addresses why a stick in a moving rocket frame appears to shrink vertically compared to a stationary lab frame. This vertical shrinkage is linked to the relativistic effects of motion and the alignment of the sticks in their respective frames. Clarifying these concepts is essential for grasping the implications of relativity on measurements in different frames.
heman
Messages
353
Reaction score
0
dear friends,
i have one problem regarding the inertial frames.it is said that freely falling elevator satisfies the above property.if there are two particles inside the elevator the distance betn. them will remain same as long as the distance is small.but when the distance betn. the paricles is large there will be tidal force from which we can detect the external gravitational fields.

so my query is regarding the origin of tidal forces and this concept is not getting down my throat.please help me understand this concept i will be highly thankful to you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
based on relativity

dear friends ,

this is the second concept in which i found difficulty to understand.let's consider an lab and rocket frame in which the x-axis of both the frames coincide in the beiginning and rocket will be moving wrt x axis.now the problem is if they both contain one stick and rocket's stick is below the lab stick then we will have to conclude that the moving stick will shrink in the vertical direction.thus i want to know why this will shrink in the vertical direction.and this consistency can be removed when tip of both the sticks will coincide and the sticks are arranged in vertical direction in both the frames.

please explain the concept involved.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top