Why Does Tying a Knot on a Rectangular Piece of Paper Form a Perfect Pentagon?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Icebreaker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Brain
AI Thread Summary
Tying a knot in a rectangular piece of paper results in a perfect pentagon due to the geometric properties of the knot's structure. The knot's tension and the way it interacts with the paper create specific angles and lengths that align to form a pentagon. Resources like "Cut the Knot" and Jim Loy's geometry site provide insights into this phenomenon. The discussion emphasizes the mathematical and geometric principles behind this intriguing observation. Understanding these concepts can deepen appreciation for the relationship between geometry and everyday objects.
Icebreaker
Take a long rectangular piece of paper, and tie a simple knot. Carefully pull it into place and the location of the knot will be a perfect pentagon. Why?

(Not a brain teaser, I really don't know the answer.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
No, in fact, I did not.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top