Why does work have the wrong units?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Vitani11
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Units Work
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the work done when pulling a string attached to a particle moving in a circular path on a frictionless table. The initial calculations involve integrating force with respect to radius, but participants identify issues with dimensional consistency and the treatment of angular velocity as a constant. There is confusion regarding the relationship between the varying radius and angular velocity, leading to incorrect results. Corrections are suggested, emphasizing the need to properly account for the changing nature of both radius and angular velocity during integration. The conversation highlights the importance of careful variable management in physics problems.
Vitani11
Messages
275
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


A particle of mass m is moving on a frictionless horizontal table and is attached to a massless string that passes through a tiny hole of negligible radius in the table, and I am holding the other end of the string underneath the table. Initially the particle is moving in a circle of radius r0 with angular velocity ω0, but I now pull the string down until the radius reaches r. Assuming that I pull the string so slowly that we can approximate the particle’s path by a circle of slowly shrinking radius, calculate the work I did by pulling the string, and compare it to your answer in (5.1).

Homework Equations


W = ∫F⋅dr
Answer for KE is [(mωo2ro2)/2]((ro/r)2-1)

The Attempt at a Solution


W = ∫F⋅dr = ∫mv2/r dr= ∫mω2rdr = (mω2/2)(r2-ro2)

From conservation of angular momentum I get that ω = (ωoro2)/r. replacing this with the result gives (mωo2ro4)/2[((ro/r)2-1)] and the units don't check out. Shouldn't this be the same as KE?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Vitani11 said:
From conservation of angular momentum I get that ω = (ωoro2)/r.
This equation is not dimensionally consistent and thus cannot be true.
 
  • Like
Likes Vitani11
Oh that is v not omega. Crap, stupid mistakes. I got (mωo2ro4)/2r2[(1-(ro/r)2)]
 
To check this answer I set it equal to KE to see if it turned to 0 but instead it gave me that r=-ro which isn't true. Is this answer still correct or is this not a good way to check your answer?
 
Vitani11 said:
To check this answer I set it equal to KE to see if it turned to 0 but instead it gave me that r=-ro which isn't true. Is this answer still correct or is this not a good way to check your answer?

The problem is in here is ##F## is not constant as you can see ##F=\frac {mv^2} {r}## but here ##v## depends on ##r## (angular momentum conservation).So you have to find first ##F(r)##
 
  • Like
Likes Vitani11
Vitani11 said:
∫mω2rdr = (mω2/2)(rr02)
Please post your steps there. How do you handle the fact that r and ω are both varying?
 
  • Like
Likes Vitani11
haruspex said:
Please post your steps there. How do you handle the fact that r and ω are both varying?
Typo. It should have been W = ∫F⋅dr = ∫mv2/r dr= ∫mω2rdr = (mω2/2)(r2-ro2)
 
Vitani11 said:
Typo. It should have been W = ∫F⋅dr = ∫mv2/r dr= ∫mω2rdr = (mω2/2)(r2-ro2)
But that is wrong. In the integration you treated ω as constant.
 
  • Like
Likes Vitani11
Got it, thanks
 
Back
Top