Why doesn't a fluorescent lamp implode and shatter ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hurricane939
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lamp
Click For Summary
Fluorescent lamps maintain a low internal pressure of 0.3% of atmospheric pressure, creating a pressure difference that is not sufficient to shatter the glass. The strength of the lamp's tubular shape, akin to arches, provides greater resistance to pressure compared to flat surfaces like windows. If the lamp were rectangular, it would be more susceptible to shattering unless the glass was significantly thick. This principle of using curved surfaces for vacuum vessels is widely applicable in various technologies, including CRTs and dewar flasks. The design of fluorescent lamps effectively prevents implosion despite the pressure differential.
Hurricane939
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Accoring to Wikipedia, the pressure inside a fluorescent lamp is 0.3% of the atmospheric pressure, so the pressure difference between the outside and the inside of the lamp is almost equal to the atmospheric pressure which is 1 bar or 14.7 psi.

Now according to this and this, glass shatters at an overpressure of about 1 psi, and sometimes even less than that.

So why doesn't the difference in pressure between the outside and the inside of a fluorescent lamp cause the glass to shatter ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The article is referring to windows, which are flat. Arches (tubes)are much stronger.
 
russ_watters said:
The article is referring to windows, which are flat. Arches (tubes)are much stronger.
So if the lamp shape was rectangular for example, would it shatter ?
 
Hurricane939 said:
So if the lamp shape was rectangular for example, would it shatter ?
Yes; unless the glass was very thick. The principle of using curved surfaces for vacuum vessels is pretty universal. CRTs, radio valves, dewar flasks . . . . .
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
32
Views
9K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K