Why Doesn't a Windshield Shatter When a Fly Hits It at High Speed?

AI Thread Summary
When a fly hits a truck's windshield at high speed, it does not shatter due to the principles of physics, specifically Newton's second law. The fly, having a small mass, experiences a large acceleration but produces a moderate force upon impact. This force is equal and opposite to the force exerted on the fly, which is also moderate and insufficient to break the glass. Additionally, the massive weight of the truck means that the impact does not significantly affect its speed. Therefore, the combined effects of mass and force explain why the windshield remains intact despite the collision.
sanado
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
Hey guys, I was just wondering if you could help me with a question that has been bugging me for a while now. I've thought of many possibilities to the answer yet i still can't find the right one. The question is that, when a fly strikes the windshield of a truck moving at let's say 60km/h, why doesn't the windscreen shatter. The fly would experience a huge force in order to make it travel at the same speed of the truck and according to Newtons third law, every action has an equal and opposite reaction. Therefor, wouldn't that huge force on the fly cause a huge reaction on the glass, hence shattering you?

Any assistance to this question would be most appreciated.
Thanks in advance
 
Science news on Phys.org
While it's certainly true that the contact force exerted on the fly equals the force exerted on the windscreen (thanks to Newton's 3rd), why assume that a force that would splatter a fly is sufficient to shatter a windscreen?
 
I think that you are confusing the force on the fly (tiny) with the effects of the force (huge acceleration, thus squish). The windscreen area the fly hits depresses a tiny bit to provide this tiny force.
 
sanado said:
Hey guys, I was just wondering if you could help me with a question that has been bugging me for a while now. I've thought of many possibilities to the answer yet i still can't find the right one. The question is that, when a fly strikes the windshield of a truck moving at let's say 60km/h, why doesn't the windscreen shatter. The fly would experience a huge force in order to make it travel at the same speed of the truck and according to Newtons third law, every action has an equal and opposite reaction. Therefor, wouldn't that huge force on the fly cause a huge reaction on the glass, hence shattering you?

Any assistance to this question would be most appreciated.
Thanks in advance
This is actually a 2nd law question, not 3rd law. The fly experiences a very large acceleration, but since its mass is very small by F = ma you get a moderate force. The reaction force is equal and opposite, so it also is moderate and therefore not strong enough to shatter the glass. Also, since the mass of the car is so large the moderate force doesn't decelerate it very much at all.
 
I was watching a Khan Academy video on entropy called: Reconciling thermodynamic and state definitions of entropy. So in the video it says: Let's say I have a container. And in that container, I have gas particles and they're bouncing around like gas particles tend to do, creating some pressure on the container of a certain volume. And let's say I have n particles. Now, each of these particles could be in x different states. Now, if each of them can be in x different states, how many total...
Thread 'Why work is PdV and not (P+dP)dV in an isothermal process?'
Let's say we have a cylinder of volume V1 with a frictionless movable piston and some gas trapped inside with pressure P1 and temperature T1. On top of the piston lay some small pebbles that add weight and essentially create the pressure P1. Also the system is inside a reservoir of water that keeps its temperature constant at T1. The system is in equilibrium at V1, P1, T1. Now let's say i put another very small pebble on top of the piston (0,00001kg) and after some seconds the system...
Back
Top