Why Doesn't an Egg Break When Caught in a Sheet?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kmax12
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Egg
AI Thread Summary
The egg does not break when caught in a sheet because it decelerates gradually, reducing the force exerted on its shell. Unlike a hard surface, which causes a rapid stop and high average force, the sheet allows for a longer deceleration time. This extended collision duration results in a lower average force acting on the egg, preventing it from cracking. The principles of momentum and Newton's laws of motion explain this phenomenon, emphasizing the importance of how forces are applied during impact. Overall, the sheet effectively absorbs the energy of the egg's fall, ensuring its integrity.
kmax12
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Two students hold an open bed sheet loosely by its corners to form a "catching net." The instructor asks a third student to throw an egg into the middle of the sheet as hard as possible. Why doesn't the egg's shell break?

does this have to do with momentum? inertia? Newtons laws?

so far my answer is: The eggs shell does not break because the egg slowly decelerates. what else can i add
 
Physics news on Phys.org
right, what exactly makes the egg slowly decelerate?
you know what happens when the egg hits the floor or a hard surface, how can you describe the surface of the sheet? and what it does as the egg hits it.

you can describe it through the average force of the collision. When the egg hits a hard surface the collision is short (less than .1s I think). But when it hits the sheet how long does it take for the collision to stop? a rough estimate should be enough to help describe why the egg shell doesn't break.
 
how does this sound: The eggs shell does not break because of the rate of decelerates. When an egg hits a floor the egg comes to stop in a extremely short period of time. This creates a high average force on the egg. When a egg it the sheet it is taking a long time to come to rest and the average force applied to the shell is smaller.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top