Why Doesn’t Load Power Keep Increasing with Load Resistance?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between load resistance and load power in electrical circuits, specifically referencing the maximum power transfer theorem. As load resistance increases, power initially rises until it equals the Thevenin resistance, after which power begins to decline as resistance approaches infinity, resembling an open circuit. The conversation highlights that the Thevenin voltage is typically fixed, which influences power calculations. Participants also touch on the complexities of circuits with reactive components, noting that maximum power transfer occurs when load impedance matches the source impedance. Overall, the maximum power transfer theorem remains applicable under the assumption of a constant source voltage.
JJBladester
Gold Member
Messages
281
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



"If the load voltage at the output of a circuit keeps going up as the load resistance is increased, why doesn’t the load power keep going up as well?"

Homework Equations



The maximum power transfer theorem states:
A load will receive maximum power from a network when its resistance is exactly equal to the Thevenin resistance of the network applied to the load. That is,

RL=Rth

max_power.JPG


RL = Load resistance

PL = Power dissipated by load

Rth = Thevenin resistance

I_L=\frac{E_{th}}{R_{th}+R_L}=\frac{E_{th}}{R_{th}+R_{th}}=\frac{E_{th}}{2R_{th}}

P_{L_{max}}=I_{L}^{2}R_L=\left (\frac{E_{th}}{2R_{th}} \right )^{2}\left (R_{th} \right )=\frac{E_{th}^{2}R_{th}}{4R_{th}^{2}}=\frac{E_{th}^{2}}{4R_{th}}

The Attempt at a Solution



Here's how I answered this question.

The power *will* keep going up until RL = Rth. The graph of PL versus RL reaches a maximum (d/dRL = 0) at that point. Thereafter, PL will gradually decline as R approaches infinity.

R approaching infinity is analogous to an open circuit in which no current can flow. With no current flow, there can be no power.

That's how I answered the question, but I'm not fully satisfied with my answer. Maybe I'm actually not satisfied with the wording of the original question... A Thevenin voltage source wouldn't change; it would be fixed, right? Thus, this question is sort of mis-stated in my opinion.

Doesn't the maximum power transfer theorem assumes a fixed source voltage?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think your answer is fine. When the load resistance increases past the source resistance, less current flows throught the load, reducing the power dissipated.

BTW, have you learned yet that for circuits with reactive components (like inductors and capacitors), the maximum power transfer occurs when the load impedance is the complex conjugate of the source impedance? When the circuit only has resistors, there is no imaginary component to the impedances, so maximum power is transferred when the resistances are equal.
 
berkeman said:
I think your answer is fine.

Thank you. I'm still curious whether the maximum power transfer theorem is applicable if the source voltage is allowed to increase. My understanding of a Thevenin circuit was that Eth was *fixed*.

berkeman said:
BTW, have you learned yet that for circuits with reactive components (like inductors and capacitors), the maximum power transfer occurs when the load impedance is the complex conjugate of the source impedance?

Berkeman, I haven't learned this yet. We just got into capacitors. I'm excited to learn about the M.P.T.T. for cases other than simply resistors!
 
JJBladester said:
Thank you. I'm still curious whether the maximum power transfer theorem is applicable if the source voltage is allowed to increase. My understanding of a Thevenin circuit was that Eth was *fixed*.

The source is usually a fixed value for these calculations. I'm not sure what it means for the source voltage to be "allowed" to increase. Sources are usually fixed, unless they have some strange behavior. They can be current limited, for example, as many real power supplies are. But that will result in a decrease in output voltage if the current limit is reached...
 
The initial statement of the problem said that the load voltage rises as the load resistance rises, which is perfectly true for even a fixed value of Eth; in the limit as RL approaches infinite resistance the load voltage approaches Eth.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top