Why doesn't the Spring Force change on splitting?

Click For Summary
When a spring with spring constant K and length L is split into two parts, K1 and K2, the spring force remains constant due to the principles of Hooke's Law and Newton's Third Law. The force exerted by the first spring (K1) on the second spring (K2) is equal and opposite, resulting in the relationship K1*L1 = K2*L2. This means that the total displacement L is the sum of the displacements of the two springs, L = L1 + L2. The forces remain equal because they are interconnected, maintaining the same overall spring force throughout the system. Understanding this relationship clarifies why the spring force does not change upon splitting.
navneet9431
Gold Member
Messages
107
Reaction score
9
Suppose a spring of spring constant=K and Length=L is split into two parts L1 and L2, with spring constants K1 and K2 respectively.

Then,why is it such that the spring force F=K1*L1=K2*L2=K*L?

Please give an intuitive explanation of why the spring force doesn't change?

I will be thankful for help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If I understand correctly, you asking why all those forces are equal in the case we have two springs connected in series.

Lets focus on spring with constant ##K_2##. To this spring are connected the spring with constant ##K_1## and the block (whose displacement is ##L=L_1+L_2## from the equilibrium position)
We can view the spring with constant ##K_1## as another hypothetical block connected to spring ##K_2##. Hence the force that the spring ##K_2## applies to this hypothetical block is by hook's law equal to $$F_{21}=K_2L_2 (1)$$.
By Newton's 3rd law the hypothetical block applies to the spring ##K_2## a force opposite and equal $$F_{12}=F_{21} (2)$$.

Now we focus on spring ##K_1##. To this spring is connected the spring ##K_2## which also can be viewed as a hypothetical block connected to spring ##K_1##. The force applied from spring ##K_1## to this hypothetical block is essentially the force ##F_{12}## and by hook's law it is equal $$F_{12}=K_1L_1 (3)$$
By combining (1) (2) and (3) we get that ##K_1L_1=K_2L_2##.

Maybe my explanation is not very intuitive but I don't see any other way how we can prove it, without viewing the springs as hypothetical blocks and also have to use Newtons 3rd Law.
 
For simple comparison, I think the same thought process can be followed as a block slides down a hill, - for block down hill, simple starting PE of mgh to final max KE 0.5mv^2 - comparing PE1 to max KE2 would result in finding the work friction did through the process. efficiency is just 100*KE2/PE1. If a mousetrap car travels along a flat surface, a starting PE of 0.5 k th^2 can be measured and maximum velocity of the car can also be measured. If energy efficiency is defined by...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K